[AT] Right to repair

[Mike M]

Hi Steve,
That makes sense, to somehow contain the stream, it's not a lot, maybe
10-15 ml, but that happens to every car all day 24/7 at this station.
I've seen those snorkel devices, but zero stations around here have
them. In fact I don't Michigan has any.  I understand why the sensors
need to be on there, for emissions, and all, but, but it shouldn't cost
$300 to replace. At some point they will reach the point of diminishing
returns on emissions, and they will price cars out of most people's
price range. A car is only going to run so clean, and I believe, we are
at or close to that point.

Mike M

On 11/27/2019 5:34 AM, Stephen Offiler wrote:
> Hi Mike:
>
> Around here, fuel stations are held to vapor-recovery standards.  I'm
> sure this varies in different parts of the country.   There's an
> "umbrella" looking maybe 6" diameter surrounding the nozzle.  Not
> sealing in any way.  The hose is "coaxial".  Inner flows fuel, outer
> is vapor.  They pull a small vacuum to draw in the fumes.
>
> SO
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 10:35 PM Mike M <meulenms at gmx.com
> <mailto:meulenms at gmx.com>> wrote:
>
>     Thank you Carl, I will keep that in mind if the problem rears it's
>     ugly
>     head again.  Wonder why the fuel stations aren't held to the same
>     standards? Oh, wait that's right we don't have lobbyist.
>
>     Mike M
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AT mailing list
> AT at lists.antique-tractor.com
> http://lists.antique-tractor.com/listinfo.cgi/at-antique-tractor.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.antique-tractor.com/pipermail/at-antique-tractor.com/attachments/20191127/9469c54c/attachment.htm>