[AT] Supposedly why our old tractors are not metric and a fairly simple tutorial

Cecil Bearden crbearden at copper.net
Tue Feb 25 13:31:31 PST 2020


I have thought about that, and have an old and a newer 4 post lift just 
not installed.   When you work on both trucks and tractors, the lift can 
get in the way.  I would like to install the 4 post 30K lift, but the 
floor has water pipes for heat under the slab.  We don't know where they 
are, and the posts have to have a pier under them.  The floor has 8" 
piers under the slab, cannot remember where they are.  I thought of 
fastening 4' x 4' plates 1in thick to the floor and then fasten the 
posts to them. The floor is reinforced with reinforcing steel.  I need 
to find the reinforcing in the floor and try to miss the bars with the 
plate anchors.
Cecil

On 2/25/2020 2:14 PM, Thomas Martin wrote:
>
> Surely a two poster would be a better bet?
>
> Tom
>
>> On 26 February 2020 at 08:29 Cecil Bearden <crbearden at copper.net> wrote:
>>
>> Since I have a spinal problem and now one worn out stiff knee, 
>> getting up and down under anything is a problem.  Once I get down I 
>> have to either make do with what I have or haul all 300 lbs of myself 
>> up and get what I need then when I get within a foot of the floor, I 
>> usually just try to fall on something soft!!!!!!  I have seriously 
>> been looking at this creeper made for aircraft. 
>> https://ezcreeper.com/ I just wish it was available with an electric 
>> pump.  I have been looking for a drill powered hydraulic pump to 
>> adapt to this creeper.
>> Cecil
>>
>> On 2/25/2020 12:56 PM, Ron Cook wrote:
>>>
>>> Which is what I do.  And danged if I still don't have the right one!
>>>
>>> Ron Cook, Salix, IA
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2/25/2020 12:47 PM, Stephen Offiler wrote:
>>>> As a matter of fact I turn 58 today, and I maintain my physical 
>>>> fitness to the best of my ability, so you're probably right in that 
>>>> regard.  But sorry, I reject the notion that bringing the wrong 
>>>> wrench is a blood-pressure-raising event, and I stand fast by my 
>>>> comment.  This simply isn't an argument against the metric system.  
>>>> Seriously, just bring several wrenches...
>>>>
>>>> SO
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 1:28 PM < deanvp at att.net 
>>>> <mailto:deanvp at att.net>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>     Steve,
>>>>
>>>>     You may not have reached the age where getting down and under a
>>>>     vehicle and then getting back up is a major effort.  Having the
>>>>     wrong wrench when I get under there is not a happy event. 
>>>>     Should I give up DIY wrenching?  Not a chance as long as my
>>>>     body is still warm.  If I didn’t keep trying to do this stuff I
>>>>     would have been 6’ under a long time ago,
>>>>
>>>>     Dean VP
>>>>
>>>>     Apache Junction, AZ
>>>>
>>>>     *From:* AT <at-bounces at lists.antique-tractor.com
>>>>     <mailto:at-bounces at lists.antique-tractor.com>> *On Behalf Of
>>>>     *Stephen Offiler
>>>>     *Sent:* Tuesday, February 25, 2020 8:18 AM
>>>>     *To:* Antique Tractor Email Discussion Group
>>>>     <at at lists.antique-tractor.com
>>>>     <mailto:at at lists.antique-tractor.com>>
>>>>     *Subject:* Re: [AT] Supposedly why our old tractors are not
>>>>     metric and a fairly simple tutorial
>>>>
>>>>     You might want to re-think the whole DIY wrenching thing if
>>>>     that's all it takes to get your blood pressure up.
>>>>
>>>>     SO
>>>>
>>>>     On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 10:13 AM ustonThomas Mehrkam
>>>>     <tmehrkam at sbcglobal.net <mailto:tmehrkam at sbcglobal.net>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>         It was a evil plot to sell us another set of tools. The
>>>>         proof is I still need two sets to service my modern pickup.
>>>>
>>>>         It sells a lot of blood pressure meds. Especially when I
>>>>         crawl under the darn thing only to find that one d at m bolt
>>>>         is metric causing a cussing wrench throwing fit as I crawl
>>>>         back out to get that evil metric wrench.
>>>>
>>>>         Sent from AT&T Yahoo Mail on Android
>>>>         <https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature>
>>>>
>>>>             On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 3:40 AM, Thomas Martin
>>>>
>>>>             <tmartin at xtra.co.nz <mailto:tmartin at xtra.co.nz>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>             > On 25 February 2020 at 17:12 John Hall
>>>>             <jtchall at nc.rr.com <mailto:jtchall at nc.rr.com>> wrote:
>>>>             >
>>>>             >
>>>>             > Don't know why they couldn't change pipe threads,
>>>>             after all the rest of
>>>>             > the planet uses 60 deg, not 55 for the British
>>>>             threads. Can't really see
>>>>             > how it is simpler than what we use. I mean how
>>>>             exactly do the Japanese
>>>>             > explain such? Never seen a German print in inches
>>>>             either for that
>>>>             > matter. If metric is so much better, then go all in I
>>>>             say.
>>>>
>>>>             Well the rest of the world for a long time was British
>>>>             or used British technology
>>>>             before Sellars came along with his 60º thread form in
>>>>             the US. The US wasn't a great exporter
>>>>             at the time, focusing more on internal expansion &
>>>>             self-sufficiency
>>>>             >
>>>>             > You missed the part about leaving out the bastard
>>>>             pipe threads, didn't
>>>>             > you? We did so much hydraulic work at one point that
>>>>             all I stocked was
>>>>             > NPTF, it works for NPT.  As you know, NPT covers the
>>>>             vast majority,
>>>>             > while NPTF will cover the majority of whats left. The
>>>>             scraps can be left
>>>>             > to those who specialize in oddities.
>>>>             >
>>>>             > Never needed an IH bearing that I couldn't source
>>>>             from wherever. The
>>>>             > only roller bearing I ever needed that was
>>>>             manufacture specific was the
>>>>             > plunger bearing on a New Holland baler. Motion
>>>>             industries finally was
>>>>             > able to cross it, but I couldn't find it any where
>>>>             else, not even
>>>>             > aftermarket ag parts. And the bearing housing had to
>>>>             come from New
>>>>             > Holland, nothing even close. That set up cost me
>>>>             close to $300
>>>>             >
>>>>             I think there is a slight time frame difference in our
>>>>             work experience,
>>>>             My experience with Cat, IH, & AC was in the 60s & 70
>>>>             and included
>>>>             machinery built in the 50s. Cat & IH did insist on
>>>>             bearings that were
>>>>             only Cat & IH inclusive, whereas AC crawlers that used
>>>>             more Timken style
>>>>             bearings, could be sourced from any bearing supply co.
>>>>             Five times cheaper
>>>>             than Cat Or IH equivalents.
>>>>             An interesting aside was that, rarely was there a need
>>>>             for machining with
>>>>             AC, Cat or, IH as regards remedial repair of parts.
>>>>             Good designs leave little
>>>>             room for improvement.
>>>>
>>>>             > We have an entire section of bastard taps at work, it
>>>>             has just as many
>>>>             > oddball metrics as it does english. It all depends on
>>>>             the industries you
>>>>             > support as to what is in your tool crib.
>>>>             >
>>>>             Around here, its fruit and meat processing.
>>>>             At the local Heinz cannery, all the peach & pear lines
>>>>             were American sourced,
>>>>             and the makers delighted in shaft sizes like 1-7/16",
>>>>             1-9/16" & 1-15/16"
>>>>             with ODs to match. Only source was the manufacturer.
>>>>             Another delight was the spaghetti extruder, it had a
>>>>             50hp motor driving
>>>>             the extruder through reduction gears, every every shaft
>>>>             was a nominal size +
>>>>             a 1/16" Guess where the bearings had to come from. It
>>>>             had one bad design
>>>>             fault in that the heaviest reduction had no hunting
>>>>             teeth, and it had some
>>>>             very bad wear patterns revealed on dismantling, had a
>>>>             blank forged in Australia,
>>>>             it was about 600mm with a 152mm face. :-)
>>>>             >
>>>>             > I've found that engineers don't always make stuff
>>>>             weird so you have to
>>>>             > buy from them, its often so you don't make a
>>>>             substitution that
>>>>             > compromises the design. But there are some that need
>>>>             a plate glass
>>>>             > stomach.....
>>>>             "Plate glass stomach"?
>>>>             Don't know that saying, although I have modified
>>>>             modified maker's efforts
>>>>             for the better, when their designs were found wanting.
>>>>             Flattering when they
>>>>             come up with the same improvement...
>>>>
>>>>             Tom
>>>>             >
>>>>             > John
>>>>             >
>>>>             > On 2/24/2020 10:41 PM, Thomas Martin wrote:
>>>>             > >> On 25 February 2020 at 15:17 John Hall
>>>>             <jtchall at nc.rr.com <mailto:jtchall at nc.rr.com>> wrote:
>>>>             > >>
>>>>             > >>
>>>>             > >> Fun fact. Did you know metric pipe threads are
>>>>             actually in inches? They
>>>>             > >> are actually 55 deg threadform (British Whitworth)
>>>>             but the pitch is in
>>>>             > >> metric. And the real fun part is that the rest of
>>>>             the planet can't even
>>>>             > >> decide how to spec them on
>>>>             drawing/print/blueprint. Different countries
>>>>             > >> have different designations for the same thing.
>>>>             Off the top of my head,
>>>>             > >> I think there are a combined 7 different ways of
>>>>             designating metric pipe
>>>>             > >> threads (taper and straight), as opposed to just
>>>>             2. Now we won't split
>>>>             > >> hairs with short projection, dryseal or other
>>>>             specialty threads--lets
>>>>             > >> stick to 99.999% of pipe threads.
>>>>             > >>
>>>>             > >> FWIW, I have 30 years in a machine shop and have
>>>>             continually used both
>>>>             > >> english and metric without an issue. Its the rest
>>>>             of the planet that
>>>>             > >> makes a big ordeal out of it, we just grab a print
>>>>             and go with it.
>>>>             > >> English, German, Japanese--its all the same--until
>>>>             we have to use
>>>>             > >> Translate Google to figure out the notes.
>>>>             > >>
>>>>             > >> One more fun fact. Next time you need some roller
>>>>             bearings for your old
>>>>             > >> tractor and start measuring them only to find they
>>>>             aren't exactly
>>>>             > >> english, convert them to metric--you might ought
>>>>             to sit down first.
>>>>             > >>
>>>>             > >> I won't even get into European conduit
>>>>             threads--I've only had to do them
>>>>             > >> twice.
>>>>             > >>
>>>>             > >> John Hall
>>>>             > >>
>>>>             > > Well, John
>>>>             > > Europe did adopt BSP (British Standard Pipe) threads
>>>>             > > back in the 19th century, difficult to change
>>>>             horses now.
>>>>             > > Quite a simple setup compared to the American system!
>>>>             > > Did you know that the US has 11 diffent derivatives of
>>>>             > > National Pipe threads?
>>>>             > > As for 11-1/2 tpi NPT, I bet many a lathe manufacturer
>>>>             > > swore when Norton invented the quick change gearbox for
>>>>             > > lathes and provision had to be made for that.
>>>>             > > In fact would say I have cut more peculiar threads
>>>>             of US
>>>>             > > origin that elsewhere.
>>>>             > > That goes for bearings also. Both Caterpillar and
>>>>             IH used to
>>>>             > > get bearings, especially taper-roller, ground to  their
>>>>             > > specific sizes, so that only they could supply, at
>>>>             a cost
>>>>             > > 5 to 10 times the cost of a standard size!
>>>>             Extortionate!
>>>>             > > Competition finally forced them into
>>>>             standardization in the finish.
>>>>             > > FMC was another who engaged in the practice in
>>>>             another field.
>>>>             > >
>>>>             > > Tom
>>>>             > > _______________________________________________
>>>>             > > AT mailing list
>>>>             > > AT at lists.antique-tractor.com
>>>>             <mailto:AT at lists.antique-tractor.com>
>>>>             > >
>>>>             http://lists.antique-tractor.com/listinfo.cgi/at-antique-tractor.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>             >
>>>>             > _______________________________________________
>>>>             > AT mailing list
>>>>             > AT at lists.antique-tractor.com
>>>>             <mailto:AT at lists.antique-tractor.com>
>>>>             >
>>>>             http://lists.antique-tractor.com/listinfo.cgi/at-antique-tractor.com
>>>>             _______________________________________________
>>>>             AT mailing list
>>>>             AT at lists.antique-tractor.com
>>>>             <mailto:AT at lists.antique-tractor.com>
>>>>             http://lists.antique-tractor.com/listinfo.cgi/at-antique-tractor.com
>>>>
>>>>         _______________________________________________
>>>>         AT mailing list
>>>>         AT at lists.antique-tractor.com
>>>>         <mailto:AT at lists.antique-tractor.com>
>>>>         http://lists.antique-tractor.com/listinfo.cgi/at-antique-tractor.com
>>>>
>>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>>     AT mailing list
>>>>     AT at lists.antique-tractor.com <mailto:AT at lists.antique-tractor.com>
>>>>     http://lists.antique-tractor.com/listinfo.cgi/at-antique-tractor.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> AT mailing list
>>>> AT at lists.antique-tractor.com  <mailto:AT at lists.antique-tractor.com>
>>>> http://lists.antique-tractor.com/listinfo.cgi/at-antique-tractor.com
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> AT mailing list
>>> AT at lists.antique-tractor.com  <mailto:AT at lists.antique-tractor.com>
>>> http://lists.antique-tractor.com/listinfo.cgi/at-antique-tractor.com
>
>
>> _______________________________________________
>> AT mailing list
>> AT at lists.antique-tractor.com
>> http://lists.antique-tractor.com/listinfo.cgi/at-antique-tractor.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AT mailing list
> AT at lists.antique-tractor.com
> http://lists.antique-tractor.com/listinfo.cgi/at-antique-tractor.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.antique-tractor.com/pipermail/at-antique-tractor.com/attachments/20200225/2fc6b479/attachment.htm>


More information about the AT mailing list