[AT] WooHoo

[Charlie V]

Glad you were able to get past the rain and mud, Ralph and get the
harvesting finished.

I didn't complain about no replies to the post.  Because the post did
not come back to me, I thought the post  never made the list.  When
that has happened in the past, I have found the missing post in a
reply from someone else, so I know it did make the list and that is
why I mentioned the reply side.  If no one replies, that is O.K., but
I agree it is a lot better conversation when replies do come in.

Charlie V.

On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Ralph Goff <alfg at sasktel.net> wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Charlie V" <1cdevill at gmail.com>
> To: "Antique tractor email discussion group" <at at lists.antique-tractor.com>
> Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2010 5:47 AM
> Subject: Re: [AT] WooHoo
>
>
>  At the time the list was very quiet and it seemed a new
> thread wouldn't hurt.  Not only did the post not appear, but there
> were no replies either.  That makes me think the post never left the
> mother ship.  If anyone had that post come to their e-mail, please
> tell me I am wrong.  thanks.
>
> Charlie V.
>
> Charlie, I think I missed that one but it may have come during the time I
> was too busy to even open most of my email. The first 3 weeks of October
> were perfect harvest weather and thats pretty well all Ihad time for.
> By last week I had a backlog of over a thousand unread emails and I deleted
> most of them without opening as I knew I would never catch up. Now its
> looking like winter is here and I should be able to keep more current.
> I know what you mean about lack of response to what you thought was an
> interesting post though. You start to feel like "If nobody is reading this,
> why bother?".
> Ralph in Sask.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AT mailing list
> http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at
>