[AT] Hello to "Pharmer"
Bruce Moden
brucemoden at yahoo.com
Sat Aug 23 18:27:46 PDT 2008
Thanks John, Dave, & others who responded;
for your input, I'll keep all this in mind when front
lawn hopping.
Pharmr Bruce
--- John Wilkens <jwilkens at eoni.com> wrote:
> I agree with you Carl. I started out with a bias
> against the N's in
> favor of the larger (in size) tractors, but the N's
> have sure treated
> me right. Boy are they good sellers! I still do
> have a long love
> affair going with my old Farmall H and loader that
> I've used
> regularily for 30+ years. But think I can say it
> is beginning to
> take second seat to the 8N I "repowered" this winter
> with a 60 HP
> Ford flathead V-8. I sure like old tractors!
> John W.
>
>
>
> At 12:34 PM 08/22/2008, you wrote:
> >Hello to "pharmer", and I second Dave Merchant's
> excellent comments
> >about off-the-front-lawn tractor sales. Got to be
> sharp, tho, and tell
> >the difference between "yard art" (will NEVER run
> again), and a good
> >restoreable ("ran when parked--maybe") item. I
> absolutely refuse to
> >mention one brand over another to answer your other
> statement about what
> >is a good one to start with, but Ford 8N or 9N
> ---oooops--- would be my
> >choice.
> >
> >Cheap (relatively speaking) and available parts
> supply; good guru's to
> >answer questions on a couple of excellent 8n and 9N
> Ford sites on the
> >Internet. Ford N's are small enough to be easy to
> work with, you won't
> >get a hernia removing the whole front end to work
> on, and the tech
> >manuals and stuff are excellent. Hydraulics, 3
> point hitch, grade and
> >plow driveways,mow grass, run a gentleman pharm,
> whatever you want to
> >do. Excellent resale potential. Not gas hogs,
> either-- 25 HP, but can
> >work hard. Prices? Depends on where you are and
> the wind direction, but
> >I use the "Rule of 9's". $900 is "Needs work",
> $1800 is "needs
> >cosmetics and re-wiring", and $2700 is "Somebody
> else restored it--and
> >comes with some equipment", and $9000 is a "trailer
> Queen"-- never meant
> >to cut a blade of grass-- or else the seller thinks
> you got money.
> >
> >OK, so I have
>
restored-refurbished-revitalized-repainted-remechanicced
> >two over the years. Use one in summer for mowing
> 4acres of grass, use
> >the other in the winter for plowing snow. I forgot
> to mention how much
> >fun they are...
> >If a choice, an 8N (1948-52) is probably a better
> bet in some ways
> >mechanically than a 9N (1939-42) or 2N (1942-47).
> (Pretty much all the
> >same one--9N,2N). [Don't ask me-- Henry Ford named
> them.]..
> >
> >Ok, boys, that's my opinion-- what's yours???
> >Carl in Vermont
> >_______________________________________________
> >AT mailing list
> >http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at
>
>
> In the wide-open spaces of NE
> Oregon
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AT mailing list
> http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at
>
More information about the AT
mailing list