[AT] John Deere????

[Danny Tabor]

   Thanks Louis,
         This tractor has the 158 loader. Everything
worked good except the PTO which slips. Whats the
value on a mechanically sound, cosmetically ahhh so so
4520?
        I'm also taking into consideration that my
Oliver friends would look at me as if I were Benedict
Arnold should I own a John Deere!!!
Danny

--- Louis <louis at kellnet.com> wrote:

> You would be better off with a 4320.  There is only
> a couple horsepower
> difference.  The 4520 is larger and bulkier.  We had
> a John Deere 148 loader
> on our 4320.  It worked out well.  I would really
> suggest a 158 loader or
> equivalent.
> 
> Lou
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: at-bounces at lists.antique-tractor.com
> [mailto:at-bounces at lists.antique-tractor.com] On
> Behalf Of Danny Tabor
> Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 5:52 PM
> To: Antique tractor email discussion group
> Subject: [AT] John Deere????
> 
> 
>     John Deere 4520? Pro's, con's, good and bad
> about
> them? What can the list tell me. Gonna call 'bout
> one
> tomorrow. I'm not to ambitious about switching sides
> to JD but that's more stubborn pride than anything.
> I
> DO need a loader!!! Does the 4520 make a good loader
> tractor? Some J.D.'s I know the front ends wouldn't
> hold up well with a loader.
> 
> Danny Tabor
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around 
> http://mail.yahoo.com 
> _______________________________________________
> AT mailing list
> Remembering Our Friend Cecil Monson 11-4-2005
> http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> AT mailing list
> Remembering Our Friend Cecil Monson 11-4-2005
> http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at
> 



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com