[AT] John Deere????

[Louis]

You would be better off with a 4320.  There is only a couple horsepower
difference.  The 4520 is larger and bulkier.  We had a John Deere 148 loader
on our 4320.  It worked out well.  I would really suggest a 158 loader or
equivalent.

Lou

-----Original Message-----
From: at-bounces at lists.antique-tractor.com
[mailto:at-bounces at lists.antique-tractor.com] On Behalf Of Danny Tabor
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 5:52 PM
To: Antique tractor email discussion group
Subject: [AT] John Deere????


    John Deere 4520? Pro's, con's, good and bad about
them? What can the list tell me. Gonna call 'bout one
tomorrow. I'm not to ambitious about switching sides
to JD but that's more stubborn pride than anything. I
DO need a loader!!! Does the 4520 make a good loader
tractor? Some J.D.'s I know the front ends wouldn't
hold up well with a loader.

Danny Tabor

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
_______________________________________________
AT mailing list
Remembering Our Friend Cecil Monson 11-4-2005
http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at