[AT] Parting out tractors - what are your thoughts?

[jfgrant]

Welllll, it's not a Dain or a "Comfort King" and it is his tractor. After
all it's only a tractor. Sometimes we become too emotional over these
things. I guess it boils down to the fact that it is his to do with as he
pleases. Would I do it? Depends on have I tried to sell it outright, do I
need to maximize the return, etc. No easy answer. I'd probably not do it.
Regards,  John Grant
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Kyle Sands" <willys_46 at mail.com>
To: "Antique tractor email discussion group" <at at lists.antique-tractor.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 1:42 PM
Subject: [AT] Parting out tractors - what are your thoughts?


> I thought this might make a good discussion.  I totally understand parting
out busted up and broken-down hulks.  I've gotten parts this way myself.
But what about parting out restorable tractors, or worse yet - running and
drivable tractors?  This link is what got me thinking about the subject:
http://cgi6.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewSellersOtherItems&userid=joe-levad&include=0&since=-1&sort=3&rows=50
It appears this seller is parting out what used to be a very nice-looking,
parade-ready tractor.  Not a perfect tractor, but definitely not a hulk.  I
don't want to villafy the man - he has every right to do what he wants to
his tractor - and I hate to single him out, but it's just an example.
>
> Somehow, it just doesn't seem right, though.  Anybody else share that
view, or anybody disagree?
>
> Kyle Sands <>< Huntley, MN
> -- 
> ___________________________________________________________
> Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com
> http://promo.mail.com/adsfreejump.htm
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AT mailing list
> http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at
>