[AT] OT: the inch is somewhat metric
Jim Becker
mr.jebecker at gmail.com
Sun May 5 15:30:37 PDT 2019
Attempting to see if this thread can go so far off topic it ends up back on
topic.
The locomotive test resistor bank reminds me of the old test equipment at
the Nebraska test lab. In the old days, they did a belt horsepower test.
The dynamometer inside the lab used an electrical generator to put the load
on a tractor. The power out of the generator was burned off in a resistor
bank mounted on the roof of the building.
The modern lab does a PTO horsepower test and the electricity generated by
those dynamometers is pushed into the electric grid.
Jim Becker
-----Original Message-----
From: James Peck
Sent: Sunday, May 05, 2019 2:47 PM
To: Antique Tractor Email Discussion Group
Subject: Re: [AT] OT: the inch is somewhat metric
The railroad I trained with was using a paper punched tape “Search Machine”.
A cable was wired into each of the newer locomotives and a cable with mating
multipin connector was wired into the “Search Machine”. In phase 1 the
“Search Machine” checked resistances of components through the wires. In
phase 2 the leads to the traction motors are tied to a resistor bank and the
locomotive operated at various loads up to full with the power going into
the resistor bank. I have seen them glowing cherry red in the winter. Phase
2 measures voltages at various points.
If a resistance or voltage is out of its range, electricians looked at the
locomotive electrical schematics and made measurement with meters. They
might adjust, repair, or replace a component. The idea was to catch a
problem before it came to a head with the locomotive hundreds of miles away
from the shop. Moisture in the traction motors was a common problem.
The company, I think, became part of Textron. The locomotive manufacturers
may have added similar features as an OEM offering.
[Jim Becker] <snip> On the subject of paper tape. Ask almost any programmer
how big a program is, he will give you an answer in bytes, kilobytes, or
these days megabytes. Ask an NC programmer about the size of a program, he
will answer in feet, as in how long the paper tape would be if you punched
it out. I found that even in the ‘90s, long after paper (or mylar) tape had
disappeared from the shops, that was still the way they answered. <snip>
[Stephen Offiler ] <snip>The very earliest numerical-control (NC) machines
had no computer, but rather read instructions from a punched paper tape, and
these were in the research stage in the 1940's and began to appear in
practice in the 1950's. It was not until the 1970's that computers and
digital displays began to appear on the shop floor. Conversion from metric
to inch in the displays was not an issue. Even if it was, the conversion
could have been accomplished regardless of the definition, because even
prior to the universal adoption of 1" = 25.4mm exactly, the errors were on
the order of 25.39993 to 25.40005 which is well beyond the precision of the
machines in those days.
_______________________________________________
AT mailing list
AT at lists.antique-tractor.com
http://lists.antique-tractor.com/listinfo.cgi/at-antique-tractor.com
More information about the AT
mailing list