[AT] 430V update

Spencer Yost yostsw at atis.net
Sat Nov 18 08:17:59 PST 2017


Thanks guys,

One of the blessings (or so I thought) was the carburetor was very clearly recently rebuilt. The throttle shaft is just as snug as one could hope for. I definitely don't have a vacuum leak through the throttle shaft. The linkage all seems correct and tight as well.   What made me wonder about the right carburetor, was the idle speed adjustment screw barely touches. You have to screw it almost all the way in to get it to even start adjusting. That's why I even looked it up to begin with and that's the only part that never seemed other than perfect.

The carburetor number is based on memory. I haven't looked at the tag since I had the carburetor off while trying to unstick the engine. So I'm going to have to look at it again to confirm it's at 541. But I'm nearly certain it is.

PS: the manifold bolts are already loose. I didn't bother ordering the manifold gasket until I was certain I could get the bolts off.  Like you Dean, my experience is spotty with positive outcomes in this regard.

Spencer Yost



Spencer Yost
> On Nov 18, 2017, at 10:11 AM, Dean VP <deanvp at att.net> wrote:
> 
> Spencer,
> One of the more important things I have learned way to late in messing with these old tractors is to not try to remove manifolds unless I absolutely have to. I don't like drilling out broken off manifold bolts and that is almost guaranteed on 50 plus year old tractors. I agree with Steve that your idling issues are more than likely worn carburetor shaft issues OR incorrectly adjusted linkage. Since you needed to mess with the throttle you might start with that adjustment. I've had more idling problems caused by linkage issues that I want to talk about because I never check that first.  Spray a little WD40, using the straw, at the shaft entrances to the carburetor body. Changing a carburetor shaft is no big deal. I don't remember if the 430 has bushings for the shaft or not. I doubt it.  The shaft is just probably made of a softer material.  The carburetor for the 430V should be a TSX 688. JD had a series of carburetors for the 420 from TSX 641 to 678 to 688 to 689 but the 430 Gas S/B TSX 688. The AF 430 would be a 678 or 689
> 
>     From: Spencer Yost <yostsw at atis.net>
> To: at at lists.antique-tractor.com 
> Sent: Friday, November 17, 2017 9:47 PM
> Subject: [AT] 430V update
> 
> I tried several things to find the vacuum leak, and the problem is either not a vacuum leak, or is just so insidious that propane and WD-40 just simply isn't going to find it. Considering manifold gaskets are super easy to replace and cheap, I just ordered a replacement gasket(carb and manifold) from John Deere(price was competitive).  At least I can rule out the gaskets after I deck/file the manifold and replace the gaskets.
> 
> I am beginning to suspect the Carb. I didn't have a hunt at idle for the first little bit that I ran the engine. But the throttle also wasn't working so I never got a true idle so I assumed the hunt was real and the lack of throttle control hid it.  Plus I am not getting the response from adjustments that I would expect.  
> 
> Also, I am pretty sure the carburetor is a MS TSX 541. The parts catalog indicates  I should have a 641. I need to pull the carb  when I do the manifold and double check the number. (Of course the tag is facing the engine so I can't see it).  Does anyone know if the 641s were a definite for this tractor? The 541s were common on Ford's, so I'm afraid the carb is been replaced sometime in the past. If that's the case that might explain my hunt.
> 
> I got the serial number research from the two cylinder club today. Here's a picture of the document they sent me. The tractor survives as it was shipped a except the "dry charge" battery of course (-:  Everything mentioned is still the same and the tail light even still works(did have to clean up the ground).
> 
> An interesting sidenote: the finish date is my wife's birthday(it is a few years older). I thought that would earn a few points for the tractor, but I don't think it did :-)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Spencer Yost_______________________________________________
> AT mailing list
> http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> AT mailing list
> http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at





More information about the AT mailing list