[AT] wondering

[Indiana Robinson]

On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 9:50 PM, Dean VP <deanvp at att.net> wrote:

> Farmer,
>
> Thanks for the clarification.  I have by habit kind of followed the
> convention that All Jubilee's had
> the NAA designation but that not all NAA's were Jubilee's. Thereby NAA's
> were sold after the Jubilee
> name was dropped.  So in my mind the NAA model name came after the
> Jubilee.  If you read the
> description of this in the following web page one could get thoroughly
> confused;
>
> http://66.49.166.42/VFTR/naa1.htm
>
>
>
> Dean VP
>
>
Hi Dean:
Interesting page. I tend to get past the 55 and newer designations mostly
by declaring them "New-Fangled stuff" and generally ignoring them.
:-)
That's not to say that a 900 series tricycle isn't on my "probably not
going to happen" wish list... With an arm twisting I could also be forced
to adopt an 800.
I do hold out a bit of hope of acquiring another
Jubilee again but I wouldn't expect to find one with a hand clutch live PTO
like ours again.
More possible is maybe picking up a decent 9N.
I have always thought it would be cool to be able to display a 9N
Ford/Ferguson, an 8N Ford, a Ferguson TO-20 and a Ford Jubilee all in a
row... Along with a good bit of printed documentation as to how things
unfolded.  Maybe, just maybe, I could keep a few guys from calling their
2N's a Jubilee and a few others from calling their 8N's Fordsons. Heck, I
might even keep somebody from running Craigslist ads claiming that their
Ferguson TO-20 is "the same as an 8N Ford and almost all parts will
interchange..."
:-)  :-)  :-)


> --
>
> Francis Robinson
> aka "farmer"
> Central Indiana USA
> robinson46176 at gmail.com
> _______________________________________________
> AT mailing list
> http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at
>
> _______________________________________________
> AT mailing list
> http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at
>



-- 
-- 

Francis Robinson
aka "farmer"
Central Indiana USA
robinson46176 at gmail.com