[AT] Allis Chalmers B & C crankshaft

Recentjester at aol.com Recentjester at aol.com
Mon May 30 05:33:18 PDT 2011


so did they actually cast the block taller? Or were the rods shorter?
 
 
In a message dated 5/30/2011 7:30:49 A.M. Central Daylight Time,  
charliehill at embarqmail.com writes:

Is that  all Herb, just the first 96?  Wow,  I didn't realize they were 
that  
rare.
That being said it's safe to say that the B and C cranks in  Jester's 
engines 
should interchange.  Well now, maybe not,  I  think
the B's started out with 125 CI engines and then went to  138's.   I'm not 
sure when.  If you can find this Guy up  around
Frederick Md, he can tell you anything you want to  know.
http://www.rustichome.com/articles/01103.html
That's all I could  find on him in a web search.  I know him personally  
and 
have  been to his place but I've lost his e-mail address.
Paul Barnsley,   aka the Orange Wizard.  I think his e-mail is 
Orangewizard@  
>>>>>>   I don't remember the  rest.

Charlie
-----Original Message-----
From: Herbert  Metz
Sent: Monday, May 30, 2011 7:57 AM
To: Antique tractor email  discussion group
Subject: Re: [AT] Allis Chalmers B & C  crankshaft

The first 96 B's used Waukesha engines; those 96 are highly  prized.
Herb


> [Original Message]
> From: charlie hill  <charliehill at embarqmail.com>
> To: Antique tractor email  discussion group <at at lists.antique-tractor.com>
> Date: 5/30/2011  6:26:39 AM
> Subject: Re: [AT] Allis Chalmers B & C  crankshaft
>
> Rob, that might be right.  A memory is a  terrible thing to waste.  LOL.
I
> was talking of the top of my  head and now that you mention it I guess
they
> were Waukesha  engines.
> I can look it up.  I have plenty of AC books and  resources.
Unfortunately
> I'm in the middle of re-modeling a  bathroom and don't really have the
extra
> time right  now.
>
> Charlie
>
> -----Original Message-----  
> From: Rob Wilson
> Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2011 11:50 PM
>  To: 'Antique tractor email discussion group'
> Subject: Re: [AT] Allis  Chalmers B & C crankshaft
>
> Buda? Those were only WD45  diesels weren't they? The B's used a Waukesha
in
> the first few but  don't think they ever used Buda's. The cranks should be
> the same but  I'd check with someone like Roger Van Camp to be sure.
>
>  -----Original Message-----
> From:  at-bounces at lists.antique-tractor.com
>  [mailto:at-bounces at lists.antique-tractor.com] On Behalf Of charlie  hill
> Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2011 8:48 AM
> To: Antique tractor  email discussion group
> Subject: Re: [AT] Allis Chalmers B & C  crankshaft
>
> Not sure.   AC used a Buda engine in the  early B's and then switched to 
an
> AC block.  I can't remember  when the change came without looking it up.
If
> no one else knows  I'll look it up in a while.
> If both are AC blocks I think it will work  fine.  The stroke should be 
the
> same.  The B and C used the  same engine.   The only difference would be a
> change that  occurred by year.
>
> Charlie
> -----Original  Message-----
> From: Recentjester at aol.com
> Sent: Sunday, May 29,  2011 12:57 AM
> To: at at lists.antique-tractor.com
> Subject: [AT]  Allis Chalmers B & C crankshaft
>
> Will a c crankshaft work  in a B block? the B is 41 an the C is  48. Is 
the
> stroke the  same?
> _______________________________________________
> AT  mailing list
>  http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at
>
>  _______________________________________________
> AT mailing  list
>  http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at
>
>  _______________________________________________
> AT mailing  list
>  http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at
>
>  _______________________________________________
> AT mailing  list
>  http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at


_______________________________________________
AT  mailing list
http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at  

_______________________________________________
AT mailing  list
http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at




More information about the AT mailing list