[AT] List member check in /list etiquette

[bridgescharles at hughes.net]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ralph Goff" <alfg at sasktel.net>
To: "Antique tractor email discussion group" <at at lists.antique-tractor.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 2:35 AM
Subject: Re: [AT] List member check in /list etiquette


> Gene Dotson wrote:
>      One offense I see is hijacked posts. It is a put down to the original
>> poster to change the content of the message and use the original headline 
>> to
>> where the original message is lost. If something new comes to mind, 
>> change
>> the header so others can decide whether or not to read.
>>
>>     Another courtesy is responding to some who has taken the time and 
>> effort
>> to offer a solution. I have often responded to messages and never receive
>> any confirmaion the party has gotten the message. Even an answer of "I 
>> don't
>> know" lets the poster know his message was read.
>
> Gene
> Your right and I might be guilty of this myself but its only through
> forgetfulness or neglect that I would do it.
> And I'd agree on how annoying it is to get zero response when you have
> taken the time and trouble to offer a comment or possible help on a
> subject to another poster.
>
> Ralph in Sask.

Hello List

Above comments are very good, and I may have been guilty of this at times. 
It is easy to do things that are not exactly right and if no one points it 
out to you, just keep on making the same mistake.

Have a good day All!

Charles
>
> _______________________________________________
> AT mailing list
> http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at