[Farmall] Question about those #@$^$$# Cubs
Bill Bains
bbains at millenicom.com
Fri Feb 10 19:17:40 PST 2006
Chuck,
Where and when is the swap meet in WA?
Bill
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chuck" <mars at nwlink.com>
To: "'Farmall/IHC mailing list'" <farmall at lists.antique-tractor.com>
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 4:24 PM
Subject: RE: [Farmall] Question about those #@$^$$# Cubs
> Thank you all for the reply :o) I am getting replacement tank
> An taking the other one that I have redone to the swap meet
> Next month here in Washington State :o)
>
> Chuck
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: farmall-bounces at lists.antique-tractor.com
> [mailto:farmall-bounces at lists.antique-tractor.com] On Behalf Of E. John
> Puckett
> Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 7:33 AM
> To: Farmall/IHC mailing list
> Subject: Re: [Farmall] Question about those #@$^$$# Cubs
>
> One note, if you originally had a short ear dash, and use the long ear
> one, the lift rod running to the rear rockshaft (if you have one), may
> need to be bent or replaced to clear the longer ear on the dash.
>
> Bigdog wrote:
>
>>Chuck,
>> The early cubs (47 - 49) were long eared dashes and hoods. Around
>> 1950
> (I think) they went to the short eared set-up and stayed that way for the
> remainder of production. They did not switch back and forth and it had
> nothing to do with hydraulics. There were a couple of configurations of
> the
> short ear dash but they were compatible with each other.
>> The 53 is definitely a short ear dash and tank. Since you have a long
> eared hood and tank, you could get a long eared dash to go with it. It
> would be cheaper, but not correct (If that matters to you).
>>
>>Bigdog
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Chuck
>> To: farmall at lists.antique-tractor.com
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 11:47 PM
>> Subject: [Farmall] Question about those #@$^$$# Cubs
>>
>>
>> Last summer I bought a 1953 Cub, I have been working on it as time
> permits,
>> I had to replace the
>>
>> Gas tank an hood since someone was to lazy to take it off an cut it
> instead.
>> (from what I have
>>
>> Seen this must happen to a lot of them). Question I have is why is
>> there
>> difference between
>>
>> The gas tanks an rear support on Cubs. I have looked in the parts book,
>> owners manual, on
>>
>> Line an see that even though the year may change there are long an short
>> hoods an rear
>>
>> Support brackets thought out the years they were made. I thought that
> maybe
>> because
>>
>> It had hyd., there would be a difference, not so, I find as before with
> the
>> age, a tractor with
>>
>> Or without hyd. makes no difference to the size of the tank an support
>> bracket. Can anyone
>>
>> Please tell me why there is a long an a short tank an bracket to match.
> With
>> every thing I do
>>
>> I seem to sometimes go the wrong direction, I bought a new used tank,
>> sanded, cleaned,
>>
>> Primed, the tank I bought, then it happened. I matched the bracket to
>> the
>> tank an I saw what
>>
>> Was to be a big problem, the old tank was a short tank an support
>> bracket
> an
>> the tank I
>>
>> Bought is a long, ugh. So as the old story goes an is part of my
>> learning
>> curve I now know
>>
>> More about Cubs.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Chuck
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Farmall mailing list
>> http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/farmall
>>_______________________________________________
>>Farmall mailing list
>>http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/farmall
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> John
> another one of them
> *.?-!.* cub owners
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Farmall mailing list
> http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/farmall
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Farmall mailing list
> http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/farmall
>
More information about the AT
mailing list