[AT] re : hayride / accidents
charlie hill
chill8 at cox.net
Wed Nov 2 13:54:28 PST 2005
I don't think I said that. You need to read my post again.
Charlie
----- Original Message -----
From: "Almost-Running Deere" <deereman1000 at hotmail.com>
To: <at at lists.antique-tractor.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 1:21 PM
Subject: Re: [AT] re : hayride / accidents
> Maybe but that doen't given trucks the right to run them down either. The
> truck driver has a little safety responsibility as well. Very cold not to
> feel for the people that were killed and example of what is wrong with the
> world when we say "those people were killed but it was their fault"
>
>
>>From: "charlie hill" <chill8 at cox.net>
>>Reply-To: Antique tractor email discussion group
>><at at lists.antique-tractor.com>
>>To: "Antique tractor email discussion group"
>><at at lists.antique-tractor.com>
>>Subject: Re: [AT] re : hayride / accidents
>>Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 11:41:12 -0500
>>
>>No doubt that the truck driver was in the wrong (unless there is more to
>>the story that we havn't heard). The folks on the wagon were
>>right....DEAD RIGHT. Just becuase it's legal or right doesn't mean it's
>>safe.
>>
>>Charlie
>>----- Original Message ----- From: "Almost-Running Deere"
>><deereman1000 at hotmail.com>
>>To: <at at lists.antique-tractor.com>
>>Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 11:04 AM
>>Subject: RE: [AT] re : hayride / accidents
>>
>>
>>>A couple of years ago my neighbor got hit by a guy who reached down to
>>>answer his cell phone. Both the tractor and grain wagon had flashing
>>>lights and SMV signs. It was broad dayligh. Last I heard if you hit
>>>anything from behind, it is your fault even if it is a slow moving car.
>>>Let alone if you are drunk. In the area where I live there is
>>>increasing development but it is not uncommon to see farm equipment on
>>>the roadmany people to not repect it or provide sufficient
>>>clearence.......... Still not Ok to hit it because it isn't moving to
>>>suit you.
>>>
>>>
>>>>From: "Dudley Rupert" <drupert at premier1.net>
>>>>Reply-To: Antique tractor email discussion group
>>>><at at lists.antique-tractor.com>
>>>>To: "Antique tractor email discussion group"
>>>><at at lists.antique-tractor.com>
>>>>Subject: RE: [AT] re : hayride / accidents
>>>>Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 23:07:53 -0800
>>>>
>>>>It seems to me that this accident - like probably many if not most - can
>>>>be
>>>>viewed from several different angles. I am just curious if those of you
>>>>who
>>>>are inclined to unload on the tractor driver would feel any differently
>>>>if
>>>>say the tractor were pulling a wagon loaded with corn rather than with
>>>>kids?
>>>>When in farming country I would think that a tractor is not an
>>>>unexpected
>>>>object to be encountered on public roads and further that if it is lit
>>>>up
>>>>with lots of lights then it wouldn't be abnormal to expect to encounter
>>>>one
>>>>on the road at night (I say this having no idea what the statutes are in
>>>>the
>>>>locality where the accident occurred so this may be just hot air).
>>>>Anyhow,
>>>>if the truck driver had of hit a wagon loaded with corn then I would
>>>>think -
>>>>just my opinion mind you - that the tractor driver would sue the truck
>>>>driver for damages on behalf of the lost corn and damaged wagon/tractor
>>>>and
>>>>for any pain/suffering/lost work that he incurred due to being hit. In
>>>>the
>>>>case of this accident, unfortunately, the wagon didn't have corn in it
>>>>but
>>>>rather kids and for this I am sure we would all give the tractor driver
>>>>a
>>>>big S for stupidity. But, from a purely objective standpoint, I don't
>>>>see
>>>>what the contents of the wagon - as long as they are legal - would have
>>>>to
>>>>do with determining blame/liability. I believe that the tractor driver,
>>>>while having done a foolish thing with tragic consequences, should not
>>>>be
>>>>held liable. But ... my opinion is irrelevant as I am sure multiple
>>>>suits,
>>>>involving multiple defendants, will be brought. And as I said above,
>>>>this
>>>>accident can be viewed from different angles and this is probably not
>>>>the
>>>>right one to be viewing it from.
>>>>
>>>>Just my rambling/opinion -
>>>>Dudley
>>>>Snohomish, Washington
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: at-bounces at lists.antique-tractor.com
>>>>[mailto:at-bounces at lists.antique-tractor.com]On Behalf Of Dave Rotigel
>>>>Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 1:50 PM
>>>>To: Antique tractor email discussion group
>>>>Subject: Re: [AT] re : hayride / accidents
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> >You know this tractor was lit up like a cristmas tree with big
>>>>flashing
>>>> >lights I don't care if the trailr was totally dark how could you miss
>>>> >seeing the
>>>> >tractor and if you were close your lights would surley light up the
>>>> >trailer I
>>>> >think the semi driver is Deep Do Do on this one.
>>>> >Then why would you go for a hayride on a freeway. We use back road
>>>> >and
>>>> >pasture trails out here.
>>>> >Walt Davies
>>>>
>>>>The guy driving the tractor got EXACTLY what he deserved! Too bad about
>>>>the
>>>>others who were hurt or killed!
>>>> Dave
>>>>
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>AT mailing list
>>>>http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>AT mailing list
>>>>http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at
>>>
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>AT mailing list
>>>http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at
>>>
>>>
>>>--
>>>No virus found in this incoming message.
>>>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>>Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.12.7/156 - Release Date: 11/2/2005
>>>
>>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>AT mailing list
>>http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AT mailing list
> http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.12.7/156 - Release Date: 11/2/2005
>
>
More information about the AT
mailing list