[Ford-ferguson] Re: Ford-ferguson Digest, Vol 13, Issue 7 responses
Twojean
twojean at quik.com
Wed Jun 15 13:39:59 PDT 2005
I wish to thank you all! The comments confirmed my suspicions; I'll not
rely on the top link, and use the chains. Suggestions as to chain size
are most welcome!
Larry (twojean)
>Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Ford-ferguson Digest, Vol 13, Issue 1 Ferguson TO-20 (Twojean)
> 2. Re: Re: Ford-ferguson Digest, Vol 13, Issue 1 FergusonTO-20
> (John Shoaf)
> 3. Re: Vol 13, FergusonTO-20 bush (Buckies at aol.com)
> 4. Re: Re: Ford-ferguson Digest, Vol 13, Issue 1 FergusonTO-20
> (Mike Sloane)
> 5. RE: Re: Ford-ferguson Digest, Vol 13, Issue 1 Ferguson TO-20
> (Bob W)
>
>
>From: "John Shoaf" <jashoaf at soltec.net>
>
>I have Chains on my bush hog. They go from the top link pin on the tractor
>to just above the lift arms on the mower frame.
>This keeps the weight off the lift arms and the hydrolics system. It also
>holds the mower level all the time.
>
>
>
>
>From: Buckies at aol.com
>
>to 20, 30 and 9n hydraulics were never intended to hold in any position. By
>precisely holding the lever in one spot you may, or may not, get a position
>to hold. Any movement of the top link will erase this option.
>
>Try to connect the top link to something else. On a bush hog you really
>don't need a top link The ferg/ford top was never made to accept this abuse.
>It was designed only for tillage.
>
>That said, you may control the height with the control lever, if you are
>lucky.
>
>Pressure loss in operation is usually the relief valve or the cyl piston
>rings. or the piston cyl gasket.,,, or a bad exhaust valve in the pump. or maybe
>the long standpipe. Or maybe your mother in law.
>
>Hyd overhaul in N means checking and doing "everything" all at once
>ron
>
>
>
>From: Mike Sloane <mikesloane at verizon.net>
>
>You can see an image of a similar arrangement, using a Woods finish
>mower on a Farmall 340 tractor at:
><http://public.fotki.com/mikesloane/tools__equipment/woods_rm306b.html>
>
>The implement and tractor are different from yours, but the application
>is the same.
>
>Mike
>
More information about the AT
mailing list