[Farmall] Cub Year made

[Mike Schmudlach]

I think they are both worth about the same.  The A is more useful with the
extra horsepower.
Just a matter of taste.
Kind of like: " What's more valuable a Ford 1/2 ton or a Chevy 1/2 ton?"
the real truth is neither of them are very valuable.  They made a zillion of
each.
Parts and implements are easily found for both.

Go with what you like.

Mike
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "R Mull" <rbobmull at comcast.net>
To: "Farmall/IHC mailing list" <farmall at lists.antique-tractor.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 8:20 PM
Subject: Re: [Farmall] Cub Year made


> Which is more valuable? An "A" or a Cub? Are parts, implements available
for
> both?
>
> Thanks,
> Robert Mull
> Woodstock, Georgia
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Jim Becker" <jim.becker at verizon.net>
> To: "Farmall/IHC mailing list" <farmall at lists.antique-tractor.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 7:25 PM
> Subject: Re: [Farmall] Cub Year made
>
>
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "R Mull" <rbobmull at comcast.net>
> > To: "Farmall/IHC mailing list" <farmall at lists.antique-tractor.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 2:19 PM
> > Subject: [Farmall] Cub Year made
> >
> >
> > > What year was the first Cub made?
> > 1947
> >
> > > What year was the first "A" made
> > 1939
> >
> > Jim Becker        jim.becker at verizon.net
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Farmall mailing list
> > http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/farmall
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Farmall mailing list
> http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/farmall
>