[AT] Tractors and other stuff...

[Dave]

Dean, 
My choice of the date is rather selfish, but I’m glad you are “covered” as well!
	Dave

> On Dec 9, 2016, at 10:29 PM, Dean VP <deanvp at att.net> wrote:
> 
> Dave,
> 
> That is really good news.  Then I shouldn't be called antique either.
> 
> Dean VP
> Snohomish, WA 98290
> 
> It's better to be judged by 12 than carried by 6. 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: at-bounces at lists.antique-tractor.com [mailto:at-bounces at lists.antique-tractor.com] On Behalf Of Dave
> Sent: Friday, December 09, 2016 8:11 PM
> To: Antique tractor email discussion group <at at lists.antique-tractor.com>
> Subject: Re: [AT] Tractors and other stuff...
> 
> Dean, I’ve ALWAYS believed that NOTHING produced after 1937 was a true antique!
> 	Dave
> 
>> On Dec 8, 2016, at 11:08 PM, Dean VP <deanvp at att.net> wrote:
>> Then there is another major influence and that is those born and 
>> raised in the 1930's - 1950's era are starting to die off. Without as 
>> many follow on collectors to replace them. The New generation 
>> tractors, 1961 on have become a major portion of the current collectors interest.
>> Dean VP
>> Snohomish, WA 98290
>> 
>> It's better to be judged by 12 than carried by 6. 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> AT mailing list
> http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> AT mailing list
> http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at