[AT] Healthy Eating, was "Just checking"

[David Bruce]

Actually is was a study of previous studies  - so added no new 
information. The same issues have been bandied about for decades.

Seems to me it was a political document rather than an attempt to 
further knowledge. Typical for things that pass for research that is 
heard about in the popular press.

And a few days later the WHO walked back a bit on the furor over the study.

Wonder if antique tractors were used in the raising of the animals that 
produced these products?

David
NW NC

On 11/5/2015 6:31 PM, Stephen Offiler wrote:
>> Then the
>> >UN comes out with this latest scare. Processed food is dangerous and
>> >causes cancer.  If one really
>> >reads the whole thing their studies show that there is a 1% increase. 1%
>> >.... Give me a break.   The
>> >error rate in their study is higher than that.
> AGREED!!  That study was total crap.
>
>
>