[AT] Should Farming Be A Right?
rlgoss at twc.com
rlgoss at twc.com
Thu Sep 11 12:18:50 PDT 2014
I suspect that all happens because they grew up with indoor plumbing, Charlie, and don't realize that sewers keep people from experiencing the reality of life.
Larry
---- charlie hill <charliehill at embarqmail.com> wrote:
> We have a problem in NC with longstanding livestock farms way out in the
> county
> then over time the town spreads out to them. The next farm over is sold to
> a developer
> who builds houses that get sold to folks who retire here. The almost
> immediately try
> to force the livestock farm to shut down even though it's been there for 40
> years and there
> is no place that the owner can move it to. The same thing happens with
> crop farmers.
> Subdivisions move in next door and the home owners start filing nuisance law
> suits because
> the farmer has the audacity to spray his crops with pesticides and
> herbicides. Luckily
> NC already has fairly strong freedom to farm statutes on the books but the
> outsiders keep
> trying to stop them from farming. They even get themselves elected to town
> and county
> boards and try to pass zoning laws to put the farmers out of business. I
> guess they never
> stop to wonder where their food comes from.
>
> Someone tell me please why folks from the city move to the country because
> they claim
> to love the rural lifestyle and then immediately start trying to turn it
> into the city!!!!
>
> Charlie
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Slavin
> Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 1:19 PM
> To: at at lists.antique-tractor.com
> Subject: Re: [AT] Should Farming Be A Right?
>
> > As the article mentioned, right to farm laws are on the books in all 50
> > states and mean different things in different states. I think what's
> > novel and interesting in your example is they are trying to put it in the
> > state constitution. Seems unnecessary but maybe a lawyer here can tell us
> > why a right to farm amendment is stronger than right to farm legislation.
>
> Makes it stronger. Statutes conflict with each all the time, and it's left
> to judges to sort how to interpret them together. When you put a law in the
> constitution, it trumps statutes. So say, for example you have a statute
> that says you can't have a nuisance, ie, smelly farm, but you have a
> constitutional provision that say you have an absolute right to farm. The
> argument can be made, and I think successfully, that the constitution trumps
> the statute. Also would apply to state DNR regulations. The only
> limitation to this law will be other constitutional provision or federal law
> (Federal law, even statutes and EPA regulations trump state law under the
> theory of federal preemption). But it will stop neighbors to hog
> confinements from filing nuisance suits.
>
> John
> _______________________________________________
> AT mailing list
> http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at
>
> _______________________________________________
> AT mailing list
> http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at
More information about the AT
mailing list