[Farmall] Super A belt pulley

john hall jtchall at nc.rr.com
Mon Jan 9 19:05:04 PST 2012


Thanks for the info Jim. I had forgot about the big shield that went around 
the PTO shaft. I think one or maybe two of them is laying around somewhere 
under the tractor shed. They were probably removed since you most likely 
would have trouble mounting a sprayer pump with the shield on there. I think 
I have even seen one of the round ones that goes over the shaft, I'll have 
to look sometime. Both the tractors here have the flat shield behind the 
belt pulley. It is never in the way and definitely a must---I believe 
without it the operators pants of shoes could get into the belt pulley.

John Hall

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jim Becker" <jim.becker at verizon.net>
To: "Farmall/IHC mailing list" <farmall at lists.antique-tractor.com>
Sent: Sunday, January 08, 2012 9:14 PM
Subject: Re: [Farmall] Super A belt pulley


>
> Documentation is sparse on exactly what was on the tractor as it came from
> the factory.  The very early letter series tractors probably had less
> shielding.  By the time the updated ASAE standard was adopted in the early
> '40s, they added shields.  If the tractor had a PTO it was shipped with 
> the
> shield above/around the PTO that the implement's shield attached to.  It
> would have also had the round shield that covered the shaft.  If it had a
> pulley attachment, it was shipped with a pulley wheel and the vertical
> shield in front of the pulley.  The parts catalog indicates the shield for
> the pulley shaft was a regular part of the pulley attachment.  The owners
> manual speaks of installing it when the pulley is removed as if to 
> indicate
> the owner should have the shield.  So I presume it was shipped with the
> tractor.
> Jim
>
> -----Original Message----- 
> From: john hall
> Sent: Sunday, January 08, 2012 4:28 PM
> To: Farmall/IHC mailing list
> Subject: Re: [Farmall] Super A belt pulley
>
> I'm thinking about adding a bit of sealer when I reinstall it. Like you 
> said
> it shouldn't leak there. Then again the tractor is 60 years old and was
> never a garden only machine. I couldn't help but notice the other Super A 
> is
> leaking around the steering wheel shaft. We just put a new seal in there a
> couple years ago. That shaft really needed building up and then 
> re-machining
> due to the groove the seal had cut in, I just didn't take the time to do 
> it.
>
> Jim, were those shields supplied with the tractors? I didn't realize until
> yesterday that belt pulleys were an attachment. Dad said he remembers 
> folks
> trading in tractors for a new one and having to take the belt pulley off 
> and
> put it the new machine.
>
> John
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Jim Becker" <jim.becker at verizon.net>
> To: "Farmall/IHC mailing list" <farmall at lists.antique-tractor.com>
> Sent: Sunday, January 08, 2012 2:48 PM
> Subject: Re: [Farmall] Super A belt pulley
>
>
>> There usually wasn't leakage through the inside of that spacer.  It was
>> tightened against the inner race of the bearing.  Both were turned parts
>> and
>> the fit was reasonably snug.  It the shaft was turning, centrifugal force
>> would throw the oil away from that junction.  I've never seen an oil leak
>> at
>> that shaft that wasn't caused either by a bad seal or a missing
>> pulley/spacer.  A bit of sealer on the edge of the spacer would probably
>> stop it completely.
>>
>> The protective shield on the A etc. pulley shaft is identical to the Cub
>> PTO
>> shaft shield.  I think OEM or somebody has a repro.
>> Jim Becker
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Farmall mailing list
> http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/farmall
>
> _______________________________________________
> Farmall mailing list
> http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/farmall 




More information about the AT mailing list