[Farmall] insider info.
john hall
jtchall at nc.rr.com
Sun Mar 13 18:17:43 PDT 2011
I can't remember who was studying the others tractor, but I remember seeing
a book once where either IH had a John Deere H or Deere had a F-12. Of
course that still goes on today. I've got all the old Remington and Mall
chainsaw literature from where dad worked. While looking through it one day
I found some Homelite and McCullough stuff----they never sold either, just
gathering information to compete against them with.
John
----- Original Message -----
From: "Al Jones" <farmallsupera at earthlink.net>
To: "Farmall/IHC mailing list" <farmall at lists.antique-tractor.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2011 7:50 PM
Subject: Re: [Farmall] insider info.
>
>
> John have you ever seen the "Operation Takeover" literature from the
> 444/656/756/856 timeframe? They compare and contrast every tractor in
> their respective size range, mainly Deere, MF, AC, Ford, and Oliver with
> the comparable IH tractor. Pretty intersting stuff and I will admit in
> some cases it looked like IH was 'grasping at straws' a little bit!
>
> According to the data though, JD added over 5,000 lbs of extra weight to
> their 4020 tested at Nebraska. This was the only way their numbers are
> anywhere close to the 856. A 4020 and a 756 is almost a more fair
> comparison, weight wise.
>
> Al
>
> -----Original Message-----
>>From: john hall <jtchall at nc.rr.com>
>>Sent: Mar 13, 2011 3:36 PM
>>To: Farmall/IHC mailing list <farmall at lists.antique-tractor.com>
>>Subject: [Farmall] insider info.
>>
>>I imagine every major manufacturer is always spying to see what the
>>competition is up to. Last night I found out to what extreme IH went to
>>against John Deere. While sorting through a bunch of literature left over
>>from the IH dealer dad retired from, we found a "training" manual for
>>salesmen. I briefly looked at it and found some memos IH had sent to
>>dealers in the mid/late 70's. The first was about a price increase Deere
>>was having on combines and corn headers. Included in the memo was Deere's
>>dealer pricing. I found another for tractors that showed pricing, but with
>>it broken down into $ per hp. Also there was a note about Deere increasing
>>rear axle size. I couldn't help but laugh at this one. IH pointed out that
>>their axles were still bigger---a gigantic 1/16 of an inch.
>>
>>John Hall
>>_______________________________________________
>>Farmall mailing list
>>http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/farmall
>
> _______________________________________________
> Farmall mailing list
> http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/farmall
More information about the AT
mailing list