[AT] Horsepower question
Cecil Bearden
crbearden at copper.net
Thu Oct 7 05:27:20 PDT 2010
The horsepower data on tractors has changed in the last few years. I found
out this by accident and it cost me a few thousand dollars. I bought a Case
JX85 85hp tractor. It would not pull a 9 ft disc mower in JUly with the
air conditioner on without getting hot. I traded it for a TS110 New Holland
that is rated at 110 HP. However, both of these tractors are rated at
engine hp, not PTO as they were rated for 50 years or more... There is a
lot of loss in the drive train..... I would not own another Case/IH again..
Cecil in OKla
----- Original Message -----
From: "Larry Goss" <rlgoss at insightbb.com>
To: "Antique tractor email discussion group" <at at lists.antique-tractor.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 10:45 PM
Subject: [AT] Horsepower question
It's hard to "draw rules of thumb" out of the Nebraska tests. But here
goes --- Drawbar pull is generally in the range of 50% to 60% of the weight
of the tractor. Some Caterpillars drop as low as 45%. Drawbar horsepower is
in the range of 50% to 70% of Belt or PTO horsepower. Slippage of the drive
wheels varies from 2% to 15% regardless of steel or rubber, but rubber
generally runs a bit higher than steel I don't know that the tests were ever
run with the intent of maximizing the balance, traction, weight, etc, the
way we do as pullers. I'm sure the slippage values would be much higher if
they did.
I found out a few months ago that a one of my wife's close personal and
professional friends is the daughter of one of the men who ran the Nebraska
tests for years. I hoped she would be able to tell me stories from Lincoln
about those tests. Unfortunately, she studied music and had no interest in
what her father was doing at the University.
Larry
_______________________________________________
AT mailing list
http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at
More information about the AT
mailing list