[AT] WooHoo

Sat Oct 30 06:57:48 PDT 2010

Charlie,  that message did reach the list.  I remember reading it.  I 
suspect the reason I (and maybe others) didn't respond is that we clicked 
the link, read the story and
never got back to your message to reply.

I'm not opposed to Hydrogen as a fuel but as far as it's safety goes I'll 
reply in one word.  Hindenberg

Charlie Hill

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Charlie V" <1cdevill at gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2010 8:46 AM
To: "Antique tractor email discussion group" <at at lists.antique-tractor.com>
Subject: Re: [AT] WooHoo

> I have tried the modified reply thing, Charlie, and it seems to work
> when a new post will not.  Below is the message from the 10/16 failed
> post.  It may be of no interest, but I found it interesting to learn a
> little more on the subject.  We have several clearly marked "Fuel
> Cell"  SUVs driving past the house regularly, but this story makes me
> wonder if I would ever want to own one. (Right!  Like I would have the
> $$$ to buy it.)
>
> Charlie V.
>
> Just some readin".
>
> Not long after some conversation occurred on this list Re: hydrogen
> powered vehicles, we had a hydrogen explosion at our county airport.
> It seems some county vehicles are hydrogen powered and we have the GM
> fuel cell and electric car research facility here in the village where
> I live, as well as research at Rochester Institute of Technology in
> Henrietta.  For days following the mishap, newscasts quoted County
> officials as saying that no fuel was being transferred.  It was only a
> tank exchange facility.    When viewing photos and film from the
> scene, the only vehicle involved was a typical tank truck.  No vehicle
> was there to transport small cylinders.  It was pretty obvious that
> fuel was being transferred.  Below is a link to newscast of the latest
> findings.
>
>
> http://batavia.ynn.com/content/all_news/western_ny/520695/airport-hydrogen-explosion-ruled-accidental/
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 8:03 AM, charlie hill
> <charliehill at embarqmail.com> wrote:
>> Charlie V.
>>
>> I don't remember seeing that post but I could be wrong.  Re-post it.
>>
>> I have very few problems posting to the list, I've just run out of things 
>> to
>> use as
>> conversation starters that aren't too far off topic or political.  One 
>> tip
>> I'll offer to you.
>> I do this just because it's easier for me but it might help you make sure
>> your message
>> hits the list or maybe it won't but here goes.   When I start a new 
>> message,
>> I just pick an
>> old one, hit reply, change the subject line to my new subject, delete the
>> old message content
>> and type my new message.  That way the system just sees it as a reply to 
>> an
>> old message.
>> I don't know if that helps it get through the ether or not.
>>
>> Charlie Hill
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> From: "Charlie V" <1cdevill at gmail.com>
>> Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2010 7:47 AM
>> To: "Antique tractor email discussion group" 
>> <at at lists.antique-tractor.com>
>> Subject: Re: [AT] WooHoo
>>
>>> Thank you for the kind words, Ralph.  I do not plan to leave the
>>> company of the many fine people on this list, but was merely venting
>>> my frustration.  As you know, a post worth reading requires a little
>>> thought and preparation.   When they just disappear somewhere in the
>>> system ---oh well.  As an example, on October 16, 2010  I sent a post
>>> titled Hydrogen Power  /OT as a followup to previous discussion on
>>> this list.  At the time the list was very quiet and it seemed a new
>>> thread wouldn't hurt.  Not only did the post not appear, but there
>>> were no replies either.  That makes me think the post never left the
>>> mother ship.  If anyone had that post come to their e-mail, please
>>> tell me I am wrong.  thanks.
>>>
>>> Charlie V.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 10:16 PM, Ralph Goff <alfg at sasktel.net> wrote:
>>>> Charlie, I always find your comments interesting, so I hope you don't
>>>> leave
>>>> the list.
>>>>
>>>> Ralph in Sask.
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Charlie V" <1cdevill at gmail.com>
>>>> To: "Antique tractor email discussion group"
>>>> <at at lists.antique-tractor.com>
>>>> Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 1:54 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: [AT] WooHoo
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I have given up on attempting to post new threads to this list.  Each
>>>> time I do, the post is received by A.T.I.S., but does not appear here
>>>> on the list.  I have managed to slip a couple in as "replies".
>>>> Eventually I learned that it is not worth the effort and will remain
>>>> quiet even when there is no list traffic..
>>>>
>>>> Charlie V. in WNY
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Ralph Goff <alfg at sasktel.net> wrote:
>>>>> Yes, very quiet here, even worse at the new atis. Last post there was
>>>>> back
>>>>> in September.
>>>>> Well it is winter here in Sask. as of a couple of days ago. I finished
>>>>> up
>>>>> harvest on SAturday and we had light rain by Sunday evening that 
>>>>> turned
>>>>> to
>>>>> snow and drifting by Tuesday. This picture was taken Tuesday morning 
>>>>> in
>>>>> my
>>>>> yard.
>>>>> http://www.redpowermagazine.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=60815&st=10
>>>>>
>>>>> Time to install the snowblower???
>>>>>
>>>>> Ralph in Sask.
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: "Chuck Saunders" <gooberdog at gmail.com>
>>>>> To: "Antique tractor email discussion group"
>>>>> <at at lists.antique-tractor.com>
>>>>> Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 12:00 PM
>>>>> Subject: Re: [AT] WooHoo
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Dead? no
>>>>>
>>>>> but it has been awfully quiet lately
>>>>>
>>>>> Chuck Saunders
>>>>> KC MO
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Mattias Kessén
>>>>> <davidbrown950 at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Is this list dead?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mattias
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> AT mailing list
>>>>>> http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> AT mailing list
>>>>> http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Internal Virus Database is out of date.
>>>>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>>>>> Version: 8.5.449 / Virus Database: 270.12.30/2115 - Release Date:
>>>>> 05/14/09
>>>>> 17:54:00
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> AT mailing list
>>>>> http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> AT mailing list
>>>> http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Internal Virus Database is out of date.
>>>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>>>> Version: 8.5.449 / Virus Database: 270.12.30/2115 - Release Date:
>>>> 05/14/09
>>>> 17:54:00
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> AT mailing list
>>>> http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> AT mailing list
>>> http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> AT mailing list
>> http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AT mailing list
> http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at
> 