[AT] Sideways pictures

[Charlie V]

Yeah but that really confuses me Gene because I sent them direct to you and
not to the list.  I'm not sure exactly what pictures Charlie V. is referring
to.  I think he did send a link to some pictures...... didn't you Charlie V?


Yes, and that is what I was referring to.   I was unaware of the
pictures Charlie Hill sent to Gene off list. My comment brought on
most of this most of this confusion.  Nuff said

Charlie V..

On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 7:59 PM, charlie hill <charliehill at embarqmail.com> wrote:
> Yeah but that really confuses me Gene because I sent them direct to you and
> not to the list.  I'm not sure exactly what pictures Charlie V. is referring
> to.  I think he did send a link to some pictures...... didn't you Charlie V?
> Anyway, it doesn't matter.  I'm just glad you figured out what you needed to
> know.
>
>  By the way when I went back and looked at my sent message they were laying
> down on it.  I guess the re-orientation I did to them didn't carry over to
> the e-mail.
>
> Charlie Hill
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "Gene Dotson" <gdotsly at watchtv.net>
> Sent: Sunday, November 07, 2010 7:33 PM
> To: "Antique tractor email discussion group" <at at lists.antique-tractor.com>
> Subject: Re: [AT] Sideways pictures
>
>>    Charlie;
>>    Yes I was referring to the combine pictures. Charlie V said they came
>> through to him in vertical and to mine they were horizontal. I am sure
>> that
>> you sent them in the proper orientation and my system oriented them for
>> best
>> display on my monitor. I am still new to this monitor and will have to
>> check
>> out the portrait versus landscape settings.
>>
>>    I do thank you for taking the effort to find this information. I have
>> tried at times before to identify it and now we know what it was.
>>
>>    I always take anything on here very lighthearted and unless I am flamed
>> personally I take no offense. Sometimes you have to read a message 1 or 2
>> times to realize it was sent tongue-in-cheek. Sometimes have to agree to
>> disagree good naturedly. Many times just let it go without a comment.
>>
>>                    Gene
>>
>>    P.S. I did try to stand my monitor on its side to try to read them, but
>> couldn't control the mouse to align the articles.
>>
>>                G.D.
>>
>>
>>> Charlie Hill
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------
>>> From: "Charlie V" <1cdevill at gmail.com>
>>> Sent: Sunday, November 07, 2010 4:20 PM
>>> To: "Antique tractor email discussion group"
>>> <at at lists.antique-tractor.com>
>>> Subject: Re: [AT] Sideways pictures
>>>
>>>> After sending that reply, Gene, I was wondering if you were referring
>>>> to the forum pictures or some the other Charlie may have sent to you.
>>>> Other thoughts that passed through my mind were:
>>>>
>>>> Being a Saturday night, you may be lying down when looking at the
>>>> monitor.
>>>>
>>>> The monitor may be mounted in the portrait position rather than
>>>> landscape.
>>>>
>>>> Until now, I kept those thoughts to myself because I was not sure if
>>>> they would be taken in the humorous light that they were given. Going
>>>> one step further, the solution would be to mount the monitor on a
>>>> vertical arm and fixed with a ball to allow an easy rotation to match
>>>> each situation.
>>>>
>>>> Seriously, I suspect settings but do not really know.  Once in a great
>>>> while I receive rotated pictures and wonder why anyone would send them
>>>> that way.  Now, maybe I know that they didn't.  Also, I bought and
>>>> used an E Machine for about four years.  I was well pleased with it.
>>>>
>>>> Charlie V.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Gene Dotson <gdotsly at watchtv.net> wrote:
>>>>>    Charlie V;
>>>>>
>>>>>    I am running a fairly new e-machines 21 inch monitor. I wonder if it
>>>>> automatically presents the pictures to match the dimensions of the
>>>>> monitor?
>>>>> When I click on the links at the top, they still come out the same only
>>>>> smaller. Normal pictures at 640x480 or less than 100 bytes always come
>>>>> out
>>>>> normally. I don't believe if my old 17 inch monitor did that. Maybe a
>>>>> setting somewhere?
>>>>>
>>>>>    I opened the links at the top and by scrolling the mouse ball, I was
>>>>> able to expand them to view a full paragraph with the pictures. A
>>>>> little
>>>>> practice, I was able to read horizontally alright. Guess the practice
>>>>> reading upside down to read Ellen's papers, who sat behind me in
>>>>> school,
>>>>> has
>>>>> finally paid off. Actually the reason I read her answers was to give
>>>>> her
>>>>> the
>>>>> right ones.
>>>>>
>>>>>                    Gene
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: "Charlie V" <1cdevill at gmail.com>
>>>>> To: "Antique tractor email discussion group"
>>>>> <at at lists.antique-tractor.com>
>>>>> Sent: Sunday, November 07, 2010 6:38 AM
>>>>> Subject: Re: [AT] Thoughts on small combines, other harvest machinery
>>>>> and
>>>>> where it takes us (continued)
>>>>> Interesting that you mention sideways, Gene.  On my monitor the
>>>>> pictures come in horizontal as they should be.  I even went back to
>>>>> the Fotki sight where they link to and they are all O.K..  I am far
>>>>> too particular to post pictures that way.  Good to know they can flip
>>>>> flop in cyberspace.
>>>>>
>>>>> Charlie V.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> AT mailing list
>>>>> http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> AT mailing list
>>>> http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> AT mailing list
>>> http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> AT mailing list
>> http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at
>>
> _______________________________________________
> AT mailing list
> http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at
>