[AT] WooHoo

Tue Nov 2 04:15:36 PDT 2010

Thanks, Phil.  I am clear on that now.  The post did reach the list
and I guess I hollered before I was hurt.  I did learn something from
it though so perhaps all is not lost.

Charlie V.

On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 6:14 AM, Phil Auten <pga2 at basicisp.net> wrote:
> I do remember seeing the post about the Hydrogen explosion, but
> I cannot remember if it was the original post or a reply post.
>
> Phil
>
> At 07:46 AM 10/30/2010, you wrote:
>>I have tried the modified reply thing, Charlie, and it seems to work
>>when a new post will not.  Below is the message from the 10/16 failed
>>post.  It may be of no interest, but I found it interesting to learn a
>>little more on the subject.  We have several clearly marked "Fuel
>>Cell"  SUVs driving past the house regularly, but this story makes me
>>wonder if I would ever want to own one. (Right!  Like I would have the
>>$$$ to buy it.)
>>
>>Charlie V.
>>
>>Just some readin".
>>
>>Not long after some conversation occurred on this list Re: hydrogen
>>powered vehicles, we had a hydrogen explosion at our county airport.
>>It seems some county vehicles are hydrogen powered and we have the GM
>>fuel cell and electric car research facility here in the village where
>>I live, as well as research at Rochester Institute of Technology in
>>Henrietta.  For days following the mishap, newscasts quoted County
>>officials as saying that no fuel was being transferred.  It was only a
>>tank exchange facility.    When viewing photos and film from the
>>scene, the only vehicle involved was a typical tank truck.  No vehicle
>>was there to transport small cylinders.  It was pretty obvious that
>>fuel was being transferred.  Below is a link to newscast of the latest
>>findings.
>>
>>
>>http://batavia.ynn.com/content/all_news/western_ny/520695/airport-hydrogen-explosion-ruled-accidental/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 8:03 AM, charlie hill
>><charliehill at embarqmail.com> wrote:
>> > Charlie V.
>> >
>> > I don't remember seeing that post but I could be wrong.  Re-post it.
>> >
>> > I have very few problems posting to the list,
>> I've just run out of things to
>> > use as
>> > conversation starters that aren't too far off topic or political.  One tip
>> > I'll offer to you.
>> > I do this just because it's easier for me but it might help you make sure
>> > your message
>> > hits the list or maybe it won't but here
>> goes.   When I start a new message,
>> > I just pick an
>> > old one, hit reply, change the subject line to my new subject, delete the
>> > old message content
>> > and type my new message.  That way the system just sees it as a reply to an
>> > old message.
>> > I don't know if that helps it get through the ether or not.
>> >
>> > Charlie Hill
>> >
>> > --------------------------------------------------
>> > From: "Charlie V" <1cdevill at gmail.com>
>> > Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2010 7:47 AM
>> > To: "Antique tractor email discussion group" <at at lists.antique-tractor.com>
>> > Subject: Re: [AT] WooHoo
>> >
>> >> Thank you for the kind words, Ralph.  I do not plan to leave the
>> >> company of the many fine people on this list, but was merely venting
>> >> my frustration.  As you know, a post worth reading requires a little
>> >> thought and preparation.   When they just disappear somewhere in the
>> >> system ---oh well.  As an example, on October 16, 2010  I sent a post
>> >> titled Hydrogen Power  /OT as a followup to previous discussion on
>> >> this list.  At the time the list was very quiet and it seemed a new
>> >> thread wouldn't hurt.  Not only did the post not appear, but there
>> >> were no replies either.  That makes me think the post never left the
>> >> mother ship.  If anyone had that post come to their e-mail, please
>> >> tell me I am wrong.  thanks.
>> >>
>> >> Charlie V.
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 10:16 PM, Ralph Goff <alfg at sasktel.net> wrote:
>> >>> Charlie, I always find your comments interesting, so I hope you don't
>> >>> leave
>> >>> the list.
>> >>>
>> >>> Ralph in Sask.
>> >>> ----- Original Message -----
>> >>> From: "Charlie V" <1cdevill at gmail.com>
>> >>> To: "Antique tractor email discussion group"
>> >>> <at at lists.antique-tractor.com>
>> >>> Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 1:54 PM
>> >>> Subject: Re: [AT] WooHoo
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> I have given up on attempting to post new threads to this list.  Each
>> >>> time I do, the post is received by A.T.I.S., but does not appear here
>> >>> on the list.  I have managed to slip a couple in as "replies".
>> >>> Eventually I learned that it is not worth the effort and will remain
>> >>> quiet even when there is no list traffic..
>> >>>
>> >>> Charlie V. in WNY
>> >>>
>> >>> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Ralph Goff <alfg at sasktel.net> wrote:
>> >>>> Yes, very quiet here, even worse at the new atis. Last post there was
>> >>>> back
>> >>>> in September.
>> >>>> Well it is winter here in Sask. as of a couple of days ago. I finished
>> >>>> up
>> >>>> harvest on SAturday and we had light rain by Sunday evening that turned
>> >>>> to
>> >>>> snow and drifting by Tuesday. This picture was taken Tuesday morning in
>> >>>> my
>> >>>> yard.
>> >>>> http://www.redpowermagazine.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=60815&st=10
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Time to install the snowblower???
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Ralph in Sask.
>> >>>> ----- Original Message -----
>> >>>> From: "Chuck Saunders" <gooberdog at gmail.com>
>> >>>> To: "Antique tractor email discussion group"
>> >>>> <at at lists.antique-tractor.com>
>> >>>> Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 12:00 PM
>> >>>> Subject: Re: [AT] WooHoo
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Dead? no
>> >>>>
>> >>>> but it has been awfully quiet lately
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Chuck Saunders
>> >>>> KC MO
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Mattias Kessén
>> >>>> <davidbrown950 at gmail.com>wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> Is this list dead?
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Mattias
>> >>>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>>> AT mailing list
>> >>>>> http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at
>> >>>>>
>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>> AT mailing list
>> >>>> http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Internal Virus Database is out of date.
>> >>>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> >>>> Version: 8.5.449 / Virus Database: 270.12.30/2115 - Release Date:
>> >>>> 05/14/09
>> >>>> 17:54:00
>> >>>>
>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>> AT mailing list
>> >>>> http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> AT mailing list
>> >>> http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Internal Virus Database is out of date.
>> >>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> >>> Version: 8.5.449 / Virus Database: 270.12.30/2115 - Release Date:
>> >>> 05/14/09
>> >>> 17:54:00
>> >>>
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> AT mailing list
>> >>> http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> AT mailing list
>> >> http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at
>> >>
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > AT mailing list
>> > http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at
>> >
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>AT mailing list
>>http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AT mailing list
> http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at
>