[Farmall] Cub experts

Mike Schmudlach mschmudlach at charter.net
Thu Jan 28 10:12:09 PST 2010


 I have a whole building full of R1 parts

-----Original Message-----
From: farmall-bounces at lists.antique-tractor.com
[mailto:farmall-bounces at lists.antique-tractor.com] On Behalf Of Mike Sloane
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 10:04 AM
To: Farmall/IHC mailing list
Subject: Re: [Farmall] Cub experts

I believe that Todd is correct. I have only ever seen "R2", "R11", and "R92"
suffixes on IH parts. The parts manual will generally state when a higher
(later) number part replaces an older one. You will see "can be used to
replace xxxxxxRx" in the description. Also, generally speaking, IH would not
assign a new part number unless the new part would *always* be suitable as a
replacement for the old part. The older parts that were castings often had
only 5 digit part numbers with an "A" or "B" 
signifying revisions, adding to the complexity, and sometimes a much later
revision would be given a 6 digit number. And, of course, Case IH converted
all of their numbers to a later system, making all of our old manuals
obsolete (fortunately the CNH computers have integrated cross-reference
capability).

(Ford operated pretty much the same way, using their own numbering scheme. I
am not familiar with JD/Case/Oliver/MM/Ferguson/etc.)

The problem comes in some of the descriptions that IH engineering used. 
For instance, the instrument panel on the Cub is actually considered the
"rear support" for the hood/tank, not an instrument panel.

I agree that Guy Fay or Jim Becker might be the ones to best address this,
or maybe Ken Updike.

Mike

farmallgray at aol.com wrote:
> Hopefully Guy Fay will jump in here and correct me if I'm wrong but I 
> think the "9" in "R92" indicates that it's an assembly rather than a 
> single part. In the case of something like a dash panel, it could have had
stiffeners or brackets spot welded to it or something along those lines.
> 
> IH usually didn't give the option of ordering the older version.
> The new part would replace the old for function.
> 
> 
> 
> Todd Markle
_______________________________________________
Farmall mailing list
http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/farmall




More information about the AT mailing list