[AT] Digital Archiving

Larry Goss rlgoss at insightbb.com
Tue Mar 31 13:49:07 PDT 2009


Define "best."

For those who want no compression, true fidelity to the original image, and some other features, there is no substitute for TIFF.  But I'm more concerned about a virtual paper-trail.  As such, I can work in the header of JPEG (rather than the actual image database) and be perfectly content even though I know there are compromises being made behind the scenes.

Larry

----- Original Message -----
From: Bob W <rgw13 at bellsouth.net>
Date: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 13:45
Subject: Re: [AT] Digital Archiving
To: 'Antique tractor email discussion group' <at at lists.antique-tractor.com>

> Larry,
> 
> Just a simple question. Is tiff the best format for "archiving" 
> digitalpictures?  This may have been already discussed but 
> I missed it if it has
> been.
> 
> Bob W
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: at-bounces at lists.antique-tractor.com
> [mailto:at-bounces at lists.antique-tractor.com] On Behalf Of Larry Goss
> Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 1:35 PM
> To: Antique tractor email discussion group
> Subject: Re: [AT] Digital Archiving
> 
> The maxim is: If it has been stored digitally, it hasn't been 
> archived.
> That used to be true, and if you consider standard archiving 
> techniques, it
> still is.  But when you consider the possibility of distributed 
> storage of
> multiple copies with purposeful media migration as a method of 
> archiving,then other techniques become possible and the 
> "dangers" of electronic
> storage are minimized.
> 
> This is not an easy paradigm shift for people to accept, and it 
> opens up all
> sorts of other questions that we don't want to have to deal 
> with.  For
> instance, the original document is going to eventually turn to dust
> regardless of how you protect it and preserve it.  When that 
> inevitabledeterioration happens, does that mean that you have to 
> destroy all the
> digital copies as though the original had never existed?  Archive
> organizations and libraries are having a difficult time 
> answering that
> question.  All you have to do is look at the expense and efforts 
> that are
> being expended by Trinity College in Dublin to preserve and 
> protect The Book
> of Kells or by the various libraries that have original copies 
> of Gutenberg
> Bibles to see the extent organizations will go to.  But for 20 
> bucks I
> purchased a CD that contains the whole Book of Kells plus videos 
> showing its
> history and the technology of illuminated manuscripts.  Would 
> that digital
> copy be subject to recall if the original Book of Kells became 
> non-existent
> for whatever reason?
> 
> To bring this discussion back to tractors, is it acceptable to 
> generate a
> restored tractor?  What percentage of original parts do you have 
> to have
> before you have to agree that is no longer the same tractor?
> 
> Larry
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> AT mailing list
> http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at
> 



More information about the AT mailing list