[Farmall] electrolysis
PAUL SIGMUND
pwsigmund at verizon.net
Tue Feb 17 20:31:39 PST 2009
As others have pointed out, the electrical factors are usually much more
controlling than the chemical. I haven't seen much difference between TSP
and washing soda. All you are doing is supplying ions to provide
conductivity to the water. As long as you supply a cup or so per 55
gallons, concentration isn't a critical factor, although some say too much
may draw too much current and overload your charger. The surface area of
the anodes, and their cleanliness, are critical factors. I initially used
5 lengths of rebar in a 55 gallon tank, with good results. But efficiency,
indicated by current flow, dropped quickly after a day as the anodes became
coated, resisting transfer. I replaced the rebar with 5 strips of 1/4x2
inch flatbar, which not only increased surface area, but were much easier to
clean between runs, using a scraper rather than the wire bruch required for
the rough rebar surface. Also mentioned, and highlighted here, are the
electrical connections. Flat bar facilitates a much more secure and
effective connection via crimp terminals than rebar using clamps. If you
can find a surplus DC power supply, you can speed the process by supplying
higher voltage.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Roy" <rlk at wavecable.com>
To: <farmall at lists.antique-tractor.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 6:56 PM
Subject: [Farmall] electrolysis
> Clark
> I made a electrolysis out of a plastic garbage can and have had very very
> slow results. I used tsp and have had things in there days and not much
> changed. A little bubbleing and about 2 or 3 amps on the charger. I even
> ran it thought a battery and got nothing better. What am i doing wrong
> Roy
> rlk at wavecable.com
> _______________________________________________
> Farmall mailing list
> http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/farmall
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 7.5.552 / Virus Database: 270.10.25/1956 - Release Date:
> 2/16/2009 6:31 PM
>
>
More information about the AT
mailing list