[AT] Bridgeport Nebraska auction

[David Rotigel]

On Feb 18, 2008, at 8:56 AM, Gordon Hart wrote:

> Charlie
> I read the BC judge's ruling and not being a lawyer I don't  
> understand all
> of it But! I think what I read was that the Dykes had bought the  
> property
> and the merchandise from Phillips and was trying to file a  
> reorganization to
> keep from paying. But I also thought the Phillips had a court  
> ruling which
> allowed them to reposess the place and items? I was under the  
> impression
> that there was other property that they (Phillips) owned ( from the  
> rumor
> mill not from the court doc) that had been sold to whoever bought the
> merchandise and business property? I read this to mean the Dykes  
> have to
> payup or get out. This ruling also was in 2004 what has transpired  
> since
> then? The other things that comes to mind is, are there any kids  
> fighting
> for a share? Doesn't Mrs Phillips have the right to sell it?
> She or the buyer is obligated it seems to me to honor her  
> commitment to
> Aumman. Kurt I think could stop the sale until this is resolved.
>
> I may be reading it wrong like I say I not a laywer.
>
> Gordon

Hi Gordon, Don't feel bad. I think it will take the Supreme Court  
years to figure the whole thing out!
	Dave