[AT] [spam?####] Re: Rail cars.

[Gunnells, Bradley R]

If I were to take a guess, it has something to do with the "instant gratification" syndrome we seem to have. If we buy something online today we expect to get it tomorrow or the following day at the latest. At least that seems to be the trend. I'm not privy to the intricate details of the shipping world but I would assume trucking (smaller amounts and more direct) would be easier to

I'd love to see more transport via rail and less stress on the interstate system and I'm sure it couldn't hurt our need for foreign oil.

Brad

-----Original Message-----
From: at-bounces at lists.antique-tractor.com [mailto:at-bounces at lists.antique-tractor.com] On Behalf Of Paul Waugh
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 10:10 PM
To: Antique tractor email discussion group
Subject: [spam?####] Re: [AT] Rail cars.

So why did they go away??? ... Labor too high??? .. they have darn good
retirement (RR)

Paul Waugh
----- Original Message -----
From: "Irma Brown" <bellville1 at gmail.com>
To: "Antique tractor email discussion group" <at at lists.antique-tractor.com>
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 10:53 PM
Subject: [AT] Rail cars.


>I sure do agree with the fact it would e wise to get the rail cars back to
> hauling freight and cut down the trucks that are running. . It seems that
> in
> our country as soon as we get something that works we have to up and
> change
> it. Sometimes not for the better. Just my two cents.
>
> Irma
> Western, KY
> http://picasaweb.google.com/bellville1
> http://members.tripod.com/~DairyGoats/index.html
> _______________________________________________
> AT mailing list
> http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at

_______________________________________________
AT mailing list
http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at