[AT] quiet list-- ethanol

[Ralph Goff]

Sorry, I had to correct the mis-spelled ethanol in the title. Pressed send 
in a hurry.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ralph Goff" <alfg at sasktel.net>
To: "Antique tractor email discussion group" <at at lists.antique-tractor.com>
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 7:41 PM
Subject: Re: [AT] quiet list-- ethonal


>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: <Edchainsaw at aol.com>
> To: <at at lists.antique-tractor.com>
> Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 3:57 PM
> Subject: Re: [AT] quiet list-- ethonal
>
>
>   Railcars work  next best but there
>> are not enough of those either.
>
> And there is another subject that really gets to me. It took years to 
> build
> up a great rail transport system and only a few to cut it down and move
> almost everything by truck. Overcrowding the highways with heavy trucks 
> that
> I doubt can move freight with anywhere near the efficiency of a railway
> system. If we were serious about "going green', wouldn't it make sense to
> get the railways moving much of what is moved by trucks today?
> Just my opinion. Experts and economists feel free to enlarge on this 
> theory.
> :-)
>
> Ralph in Sask.
>
> _______________________________________________
> AT mailing list
> http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.9/1293 - Release Date: 2/22/2008 
> 9:21 AM
>
>