[AT] Re: AT Digest, Vol 36, Issue 20

Dean Van Peursem deanvp at att.net
Tue Feb 20 11:08:58 PST 2007


Soundguy,

Then you must not agree that they are a "good little" tractor or that the
Yanmar 3 cylinder diesel engine is "bulletproof" either. 

Let's just agree that we disagree. :-)

D & G Van Peursem
In Apache Junction, AZ - Escaping from WA rain, snow & winds


-----Original Message-----
From: at-bounces at lists.antique-tractor.com
[mailto:at-bounces at lists.antique-tractor.com] On Behalf Of Chris Britton
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 11:31 AM
To: at at lists.antique-tractor.com
Subject: [AT] Re: AT Digest, Vol 36, Issue 20

Hmm.. Can't say that i agree with any of that.

The 3 cyl jobs were very smooth compaired to other 3 cyl diesels.  Now, the 
2 cyl yanmars do hammer a bit.

I don't think the 3pt hyds are weak in comparison to tractor size.  My 
yanmar 1700 picked up as much weight opn the 3pt as my ford 8n.

Brakes seemed rather robust as well..

Soundguy

>From: "Francis Robinson" <robinson at svs.net>
>Subject: [AT] Yanmar
> Yanmar made them for JD. I own a 1981 JD 750.  A good little
>tractor with some weaknesses such as poor brakes and a weak hydraulic
>system. The Yanmar 3 cylinder diesel is noisy but bullet proof.


_______________________________________________
AT mailing list
http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at





More information about the AT mailing list