[AT] Cat 50

[Ken Knierim]

Anyone seen the specs on an old Cat 60? I thought they were a lot
bigger than that.

Found them for a 65.... 7X8.5, 650 RPM. Might need its own fuel truck
at that rate. Fuel consumption at rated power was 8.21 HP/Hr/Gal.
That's 8.7 gallons per hour at full load (rated at 72 HP) from the
numbers on the Nebraska test.

Diesel sounds a lot more economical. Might be why that one's still
intact... nobody could afford to wear it out. :)

Ken in AZ

On 2/13/07, Easley, Greg <EasleyG at health.missouri.edu> wrote:
> 5.5 bore by 6.5 stroke by 4 cylinders:
>
> 617.7171cid
>
> I'd guess close to 9 gallon/hour huge.
>
> Greg
> http://www.geocities.com/heartland/woods/1416
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: at-bounces at lists.antique-tractor.com
> [mailto:at-bounces at lists.antique-tractor.com] On Behalf Of
> william.neff.powell at comcast.net
> Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 12:49 PM
> To: Antique tractor email discussion group
> Subject: Re: [AT] Cat 50
>
> Wow, thats huge!
>
> I'm coming up with about 450 cubic inches...  I thought my Buda 344 was
> a big 4 and that's a diesel.
>
> Regards,
>
> Will
>  -------------- Original message ----------------------
> From: RonMyers at wildblue.net
>
> _______________________________________________
> AT mailing list
> http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at
>