[AT] Check planting
Cecil Bearden
crbearden at copper.net
Mon Dec 24 03:23:01 PST 2007
It may be more than some wanted to know, but as an agricultural
engineer, it is sorta fascinating.
Cecil in OKla
Francis Robinson wrote:
> As I said we never check planted here on the farm but I have done
> "almost" the same thing. When I was farm manager at the Shelbyville IN Garst
> Research Farm we used a cable trip system to position our micro-plots. We
> strung the cable that had nylon balls mounted on it across the field. We
> kept it on reels on wheels. The original check wire was wire with knots
> every few feet based on the row width to be planted. Ours was multi-strand
> cable with the nylon balls spaced generally 20' apart but we could use a
> different cable if we wanted a different size plot. We mostly planted in 17'
> long plots with a 3' space between each plot. We planted 4 rows at a time
> but the actual plot was 2 rows wide. Two employees rode on the planter and
> dumped a little packet of seed in open special hoppers with each hand. The
> packets were held in long trays for each two rows. Special rotors in each
> hopper spread the seeds evenly around them so that proper feeding and
> spacing was maintained when the nylon ball on the cable tripped the sensors
> the electronic system started the flow of seeds. Each packet had an exact
> amount of seed in it, just enough to plant 17'. It traveled the extra 3 feet
> not planting then it was tripped by the next nylon ball. One of the
> employees would jump off when we got to each end to move the cable then
> climb back into their seat to feed the hoppers I always drove the tractor)
> :-) The entire 4 acre plot existed on a virtual map of the field on the
> computer which showed the code number for each packet of seed. I said that
> the plots were two rows wide but in reality if you looked at the computer
> map the plots would have been wider but we did the plantings based on two
> rows. The two employes would be dropping different varieties from each other
> much of the time and the computer kept track of what belonged in each plot.
> There just was no room for error. It was the same when we combined it. We
> used a three row header but only ran two rows at a time except for some
> buffer corn around the outside of the plot. We would combine 20' of two rows
> of a plot and stop at the 3' open space . The combine didn't have a tailings
> section in it. The corn went into a little hopper where we took computer
> reading for total weight of yield, moisture and test weight then it dumped
> into the main grain tank. Then you let off of the clutch and combined
> another 20 feet and stopped again... and on and on etc. The combine cab was
> pretty crowded with the computer console and wire running all over. You also
> had to watch the printout for any anomalies. One of the more common ones was
> a piece of "green stuff" getting stuck across the edge of the moisture
> sensor and elevating the reading. The plots were replicated many times
> across the 4 acres and most of the time only the computer really knew which
> variety was being combined at any given time. I could read the code numbers
> as they came up but even back then I couldn't have remembered them. :-)
> It usually took two of us at least 2 days to harvest a 4 acre plot. We took
> turns with one running the combine and the other walking the plots ahead of
> the combine with a portable computer recording information on dropped ears,
> down stalks etc. We had three four acre plots in Indiana, three in Kentucky
> and three in Ohio plus several on the research farm itself. It was an
> interesting job but was prone to be a bit boring at times. I often got into
> strange activities like crawling down corn rows on my hands and knees with
> hypodermic syringes injecting various pathegens into the base of cornstalks
> to see what it would do to them. I usually refer to those years as my "mad
> scientist days". :-)
> More than you wanted to know... :-)
>
>
> --
> "farmer"
>
> Our wretched species is so made that those who walk on the
> well-trodden path always throw stones at those who are
> showing a new road. ~Voltaire
>
> Francis Robinson
> Central Indiana, USA
> robinson at svs.net
>
> _______________________________________________
> AT mailing list
> http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at
>
More information about the AT
mailing list