[AT] Transmission oil, 90-wt?

[kgw]

Well, _I'm_ joking...

GeneW


Mike Sloane wrote:

> It was supposed to be a joke, dammit! I find it hard to believe that 
> anyone could take my comment seriously.
>
> Mike
>
> CEE VILL wrote:
>
>> Don't be offended lads.  Mike said "REAL MEN".  Real men in "AMERICA" 
>> are not offended by his statement.
>>
>> Charlie
>>
>>
>>> From: kgw <gwaugh at wowway.com>
>>> Reply-To: Antique tractor email discussion group 
>>> <at at lists.antique-tractor.com>
>>> To: Antique tractor email discussion group 
>>> <at at lists.antique-tractor.com>
>>> Subject: Re: [AT] Transmission oil, 90-wt?
>>> Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2006 08:22:13 -0500
>>>
>>> Atta Boy, Mattias!  IMHO, how anyone who actually works with units 
>>> of measurement can prefer our antiquated cludge system can say it is 
>>> better is beyond me!  Our system has stuck around due to comfort 
>>> level, tradition, laziness, etc., rather than practicality, 
>>> functionality etc.!
>>>
>>> GeneW...flame suit on!!
>>>
>>> Mattias Kessén wrote:
>>>
>>>> Real men? Bah! So you mean that ignorance and refusal of learning is a
>>>> quality for that ;-)
>>>>
>>>> Mattias
>>>>
>>>> Couldn't leave this one unanswered
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> AT mailing list
>>> Remembering Our Friend Cecil Monson 11-4-2005
>>> http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> AT mailing list
>> Remembering Our Friend Cecil Monson 11-4-2005
>> http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at
>>
>>
>