[AT] 90wt
Chris Britton
c.britton at worldnet.att.net
Mon Sep 4 17:35:54 PDT 2006
As long as the tractors shareing the implements are allusing a UTF type
oil.. I don't see a problem. If you are using implements on a few
tractorsd.. some that uses common sump.. and some that don't.. I surely
wouldn't want plain aw-32 in my tractors rear end... Or the implement was
from a ford N.. and the implement used the rear end oil.. I wouldn't want
90wt in my system.. if I needed UTF.
Aside from the hand waving that all oils in remotes are fine and don't hurt
anything at all.. -do- keep in mind what type of oil is in use.. plain aw 32
.... utf.. or gear oil..
Soundguy
>From: "Indiana Robinson" <robinson at svs.net>
>Subject: Re: [AT] Transmission oil, 90-wt?
>AMEN!!! Abso-freakin-lutely. As you know I have been saying pretty
> much the same thing for years. I don't own any "trailer Queens". All of my
>tractors have worked hard from the day they were made. Most of the
>hardest workers have remote hydraulics and share implements back and
>forth between them. Some of those long cylinders hold about 4 gallons of
> oil when fully extended. It would be folly to buy John Deere oil for the
> Deeres
> and IH oil for the IHC's and a third oil for the Oliver. They are all a
> mix and
>are on most actual farms.
>Years ago in simpler times we kept a cylinder for the MF and other
>cylinders for the Farmalls. These days even using older equipment there
>are waaay too many special cylinders on equipment for that to be remotely
>(accidental pun) practical. What I do is exactly what most farmers do. I
have
> always chuckled at the almost paranoia that exist about various oils among
> those whose tractors get 99% of their miles from riding on a trailer. When
> I
More information about the AT
mailing list