[AJD] JD (Pioneer) hydraulic couplings (Female)

[Jim Showers]

I just bought a pair of new female and  male couplers for my 530 from Deere 
last fall.  No problem with them fitting in the aluminum bracket.  Sure paid 
for them selves by not having to add oil to hydraulic system constantly.
Jim Showers


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dean VP" <deanvp at att.net>
To: "AT JD" <antique-johndeere at lists.antique-tractor.com>
Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2006 10:54 PM
Subject: [AJD] JD (Pioneer) hydraulic couplings (Female)


> On the JD 520 though 730 tractors the female hydraulic coupling is made by
> Pioneer. However, if one tries to buy a new replacement the current 
> Pioneer
> version isn't physically the same at least the outside dimensions aren't 
> the
> same. The same male coupling will fit both.
>
> But the two female couplings fit into a bracket which allows connecting 
> and
> disconnecting the male part by sliding the female part in and out.
>
> I just can't seem to figure out whether the new pioneer version will work
> right or not. Has anyone solved this puzzle?
>
> Does any one have a cross reference list from the 50's to the Pioneer part
> numbers of that era?
>
> Is the Pioneer # 4056-4 the current version or one that exactly duplicates
> the one used in the 50's?
>
> PS: I'm referring to the breakaway female coupler JD part Number AF3000R 
> as
> an example on a 620. Does Pioneer make an exact duplicate of it?  Or do we
> have to use the new version and if so does it work right in the breakaway
> mechanism? I'm really confused.
>
>
> Dean A. Van Peursem
> Snohomish, WA 98290
>
> Forbidden fruits create many jams!
>
> www.deerelegacy.com
>
> http://members.cox.net/classicweb/email.htm
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Antique-johndeere mailing list
> http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/antique-johndeere
>