[Farmall] Re: Farmall Digest, Vol 21, Issue 7

[ED GREANY]

I absolutely don't understand your reasoning why a manufacturer would be responsible. It certainly wouldn't go to product liability in that there is no negligent defect apparent in the tractor other than someone stole it and went on a drunken craze. But for the illegal actions of the teen the tractor would still be parked and not hurting anyone so how is the manufacturer pulled into the picture?
   
  Ed

Michael Dixon <mpmbd at yadtel.net> wrote:
  In the USA, the tractor manufacturer would be the one held responsible.

> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 19:49:50 -0600
> From: Guy Fay 
> Subject: [Farmall] Tractor Ride Gone Wrong!
> To: farmall at lists.antique-tractor.com, Craig Anderson
> , at at lists.antique-tractor.com
> Message-ID: <43C312BE.6030504 at execpc.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
>
> http://cnn.netscape.cnn.com/news/story.jsp?idq=/ff/story/7000/20060109/1155000005.htm&ewp=ewp_news_0106teen_tractor
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Farmall mailing list
> Farmall at lists.antique-tractor.com
> http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/farmall
>
>
> End of Farmall Digest, Vol 21, Issue 7
> **************************************
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.16/225 - Release Date: 1/9/2006
>
> 

_______________________________________________
Farmall mailing list
http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/farmall