[AT] ford 800 vs 600 steering arm / bellhousing clearance

Almost-Running Deere deereman1000 at hotmail.com
Thu Dec 21 12:10:56 PST 2006


We don't need these little boy pissing matches

> From: ihctractor at hotmail.com> To: at at lists.antique-tractor.com> Subject: RE: [AT] ford 800 vs 600 steering arm / bellhousing clearance> Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 09:30:52 -0700> > WOW! I have only seen one from a distance but now I'm an expert on it. > Sounds like some Mechanics that I have worked with. (If you ever saw one > then you got to be and expert on fixing it.)> > Frances your old 40s Chevy had dip rods so it didn't need high oil pressure > to run. But then you being the top Mechanic that you are you should know > that HUH!!> > John P. Kennedy (Keneedy)> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------> > >From: "Francis Robinson" <robinson at svs.net>> >Reply-To: Antique tractor email discussion group > ><at at lists.antique-tractor.com>> >To: "Antique tractor email discussion group" <at at lists.antique-tractor.com>> >Subject: RE: [AT] ford 800 vs 600 steering arm / bellhousing clearance> >Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 03:35:43 -0500> >> > Hi Chris:> >> > I am only familiar with those one-arm loaders from a distance but I don't> >think gaining a little clearance would be a problem. Our NAA was pretty > >much> >all original but we had a "TO" Ferguson that had a Sherman "over/std/under"> >gearbox installed in its tranny by the dealer. The dealer had bent the > >right> >side steering box arm out and then back down to gain about an inch and a> >half of clearance for the shift lever to swing out. The shift pattern was> >like a small upside down "h" and under-drive was out and up. I don't know > >if> >they bent it hot or cold but when we restored that tractor maybe around > >1970> >the unit had been taken out for some years and we bent the arm back into> >shape cold using a ridged conduit bender (heavy wall not thin wall) and it> >took the bending fine. We were surprised how soft it was.> > I don't think I would worry much about a tractor of that vintage having> >that level of oil pressure. As long as there IS always oil pressure that is> >usually plenty. My old 40's Chevy truck IIRC had a factory spec of 15 psi.> >Like you, I do like all the pressure I can get but that gauge could be off> >or maybe the relief valve spring is tired. Of course I'm sure you have> >already considered both of those possibilities. It would be interesting to> >see it after an oil change with some premium oil. I guess you will have to> >buy it to find out... ;-)> >> >> >> >--> >"farmer" - ***** H A P P Y H O L I D A Y S *****> >> >If you cut a tree plant at least two to replace it...> >> >Francis Robinson> >Central Indiana, USA> >robinson at svs.net> >> >-----Original Message-----> >> >I've bene looking at an 850 down the road, and thinking about getting it to> >hang a spare ford 711 1-arm loader on.> >> >At issue is the clearance between the steering draglink and the bellhousing> >behind the starter, where a loader bracket will go.> >> >On my 660 there is about 1.5" of clearance between the arm and the> >bellhousing... ont his 850.. there is about 1/2 " of clearance.. thusmaking> >the arm rub the bracket.> >> >At first i thought the 850 had a narrowed axle.. but now that i drove over> >to see it again.. it's fronts are almost inline with the rears.. just like> >my 660.. except that draglink clearance issue... it's puzzling.... does the> >8xx have a bigger bellhousing than the 6xx? ( both are a 5spd.. etc.. )> >> >I guess I can wident he axle onthe 850 for some clearance.. or cut and weld> >a piece of bar stock into the draglink to make clearance for the bracket..> >but.. I'm just puzzled at the clearance differences.> >> >Pitman arms and steering arm from the box look oem.. not bend or welded up> >on either unit.> >> >On another note.. the 850 starts easilly.. idles ok, and has 30 psi op at> >mid throttle.. about 20 at idle.> >> >I had hoped for higher oil pressure.. like my naa and 660 have ( 35-55 )..> >but then.. This guy may have 10x30 oil in the sump too.. instead of the 30w> >I run.. etc.. may be old oil as well.> >> >Though I'm not familiar with the 172 engines.. I'd guess they have the same> >lube internals as the 134's.. etc.> >> >Brakes good.. radiator has some old solder repairs.. but looks like it > >holds> >water fine. No disturbing leaks.. and no water int he engine or hyd oil..> >etc..> >> >steering is good.. no slack..> >> >comments welcome.> >> >If anyone has both an 800 and 600 they can go look at.. I'd greatly> >appreciate you checking the clearance from the steering draglink rod to the> >boss ont he bellhousing with the 2 threaded holes in it, just aft of the> >starter, where a bracket could bolt to... and then compair to the other > >unit> >/ post info.> >> >Anyone else got hundred series with oil pressure numbers in that range?> >> >Soundguy> >> >> >> >--> >No virus found in this outgoing message.> >Checked by AVG Free Edition.> >Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.15.25/593 - Release Date: 12/19/2006> >1:17 PM> >> >> >_______________________________________________> >AT mailing list> >http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at> > _________________________________________________________________> Get FREE Web site and company branded e-mail from Microsoft Office Live > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/mcrssaub0050001411mrt/direct/01/> > _______________________________________________> AT mailing list> http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at
_________________________________________________________________
Get into the holiday spirit, chat with Santa on Messenger.
http://imagine-windowslive.com/minisites/santabot/default.aspx?locale=en-us



More information about the AT mailing list