[AT] 90wt oil

Clint D driggars at earthlink.net
Mon Aug 21 16:48:37 PDT 2006


So, I guess that says that we are all old CLASSICS , LOL

Clint


DAVIESW739 at aol.com wrote:

> 
>In a message dated 8/21/2006 12:48:15 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,  
>tomehrkam at houston.rr.com writes:
>
>Maybe I  am confused.
>
>This is the Antique Tractor Forum is it not.  ;-}
>
>
>
>Actually its a misnomer because an item must over 100 years old to be  
>classified as an antique.
>Walt  
>
>-------------------------------1156201370
>Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
><HTML><HEAD>
><META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; charset=3DUS-ASCII">
><META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2600.0" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD>
><BODY id=3Drole_body style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: #000000; FONT-FAMILY:=20=
>Arial"=20
>bottomMargin=3D7 leftMargin=3D7 topMargin=3D7 rightMargin=3D7><FONT id=3Drol=
>e_document=20
>face=3DArial color=3D#000000 size=3D2>
><DIV>
><DIV>In a message dated 8/21/2006 12:48:15 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,=20
>tomehrkam at houston.rr.com writes:</DIV>
><BLOCKQUOTE=20
>style=3D"PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid"><=
>FONT=20
>  style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=3DArial color=3D#000000 size=
>=3D2>Maybe I=20
>  am confused.<BR><BR>This is the Antique Tractor Forum is it not.=20
>;-}<BR></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV>
><DIV></DIV>
><DIV>Actually its a misnomer because an item must over 100 years old to be=20
>classified as an antique.</DIV>
><DIV>Walt  </DIV></FONT></BODY></HTML>
>_______________________________________________
>AT mailing list
>Remembering Our Friend Cecil Monson 11-4-2005
>http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at
>
>  
>



More information about the AT mailing list