[Farmall] Cub Low Boy 185

[James Moran]

AU-
 Bear in mind that MY Low Boy is a red 1957 which looks and acts  more along the lines of a (regular) Cub.  The 154/184/185 were of  the "newer" design and were white/yellow (not that paint makes any  difference).  My understanding from Cub expert Mike Sloane is that  the 184 is the "product of choice".  The pricing for the one you  mentioned does not seem to be out of line but, as you so astutely  pointed out...there are variables.
 I am going to forward this email  to Mike and, perhaps, he will fire something back.  His  information is MUCH more authoritative than mine, I assure you!
  Later.
  JM

Arthur Umland <artsd at aol.com> wrote:      Hi James,
        A recent advertisement offered a Cub Low Boy 185 with 60" deck with 
good tires and a new battery for $2900.00. Lots of variables are 
involved in pricing older equipment, but I was wondering if you felt 
that was a bit high or an appropriate price?
        Regards,      Art

On Apr 18, 2006, at 7:30 AM, James Moran wrote:
> On the plus side, I get to trot out the  1957 Cub Low Boy and haul 
> away her weeding result.


_______________________________________________
Farmall mailing list
http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/farmall


		
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less.
--0-1314695595-1145370581=:2637
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

AU-<br> Bear in mind that MY Low Boy is a red 1957 which looks and acts  more along the lines of a (regular) Cub.  The 154/184/185 were of  the "newer" design and were white/yellow (not that paint makes any  difference).  My understanding from Cub expert Mike Sloane is that  the 184 is the "product of choice".  The pricing for the one you  mentioned does not seem to be out of line but, as you so astutely  pointed out...there are variables.<br> I am going to forward this email  to Mike and, perhaps, he will fire something back.  His  information is MUCH more authoritative than mine, I assure you!<br>  Later.<br>  JM<br><br><b><i>Arthur Umland <artsd at aol.com></i></b> wrote:<blockquote class="replbq" style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); margin-left: 5px; padding-left: 5px;">      Hi James,<br>        A recent advertisement offered a Cub Low Boy 185 with 60" deck with <br>good tires and a new battery for $2900.00. Lots of variables are
 <br>involved in pricing older equipment, but I was wondering if you felt <br>that was a bit high or an appropriate price?<br>        Regards,      Art<br><br>On Apr 18, 2006, at 7:30 AM, James Moran wrote:<br>> On the plus side, I get to trot out the  1957 Cub Low Boy and haul <br>> away her weeding result.<br><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>Farmall mailing list<br>http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/farmall<br></blockquote><br><p>
		<hr size=1>Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. <a href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail_us/taglines/postman1/*http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=39663/*http://voice.yahoo.com">Make PC-to-Phone Calls</a> to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less.