[AT] OT Humor

Mattias Kessén davidbrown950 at gmail.com
Sat Apr 8 10:04:17 PDT 2006


We had only three channels (two with a picturequality good enough to
make watching meaningful) when they decided to digitalize the
transmissions. So we had to do something since the other parts of our
family wouldn't even consider life without television :-( We had to
choose between hundreds of channels or hundreds of channels with small
variations, so we got hundred of channels and it's so hard to tell
what's on that it made me watch less!

Mattias

2006/4/8, Thomas O. Mehrkam <tomehrkam at houston.rr.com>:
> Why dont you do just that.
>
> I have never bothered with cable.
>    1. It is way over priced
>    2. There is too much garbage on the channels.
>    3. The quality of the service SUCKS
>    4. We all watch way too much TV
>
> Louis wrote:
> > I think there was more and better shows to watch when there was only 3 or 4
> > channels.  They had to work harder to keep a persons interest.  Now with
> > 120+ channels, I can't find much of anything to watch.  I am ready to yank
> > the cable out of the wall and throw the TV's out.  Especially since I don't
> > want my kids exposed to the garbage that is being shown these days.
>
> _______________________________________________
> AT mailing list
> Remembering Our Friend Cecil Monson 11-4-2005
> http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at
>





More information about the AT mailing list