[AT] Left or right bagger attachment?

[Ralph Goff]

Well I had to find out for sure so this morning I looked in the old Case
operator's manual. Sure enough, a bagger attachment was optional instead of
the hopper for this machine. It replaced the hopper and had two spouts with
a diverter lever so you could have one bag filling while you were tying the
other one. Theres also a sort of carrying platform or chute for the bags
included . Theres a picture of it in the manual. I might get around to
scanning and posting it somewhere .

Ralph in Sask.
http://lgoff.sasktelwebsite.net/
----- Original Message -----
From: charlie hill <chill8 at cox.net>
To: Antique tractor email discussion group <at at lists.antique-tractor.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2005 9:28 AM
Subject: Re: [AT] Left or right combines?


> In the case of my granddad, I think he did most of his stuff bulk but he
> bagged some beans for seed and some oats for animal feed to be used on his
> farm.
>
> Charlie
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Gene Waugh" <gwaugh at wowway.com>
> To: "'Antique tractor email discussion group'"
> <at at lists.antique-tractor.com>
> Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2005 11:20 PM
> Subject: RE: [AT] Left or right combines?
>
>
> > This discussion of older combines begs a question from me...
> >
> > I grew up around pull-behind combines, pto driven, but they were not
> > baggers; they simply dumped into a hopper which was augered into a wagon
> > when needed.