[AT] message lag( fixing my previous post)
Ronald L. Cook
rlcook at pionet.net
Fri Jan 21 08:43:22 PST 2005
Aw, cripes. I can't even add or subtract anymore. Farmer's message
took an hour and 12 minutes to get to my computer. Still not all that
bad. Better than the 4 to 8 hr lag I have been experiencing.
Ron Cook
Salix, IA
robinson at svs.net wrote:
> On 19 Jan 2005 at 16:20, Ronald L. Cook wrote:
>
>
>>Very bad here today. I responded to a message this morning about noon
>>Central time. Haven't seen it yet. As a matter of fact the latest one
>>I have received is stamped 9:29. It is now 4:20 PM here.
>>
>>Ron Cook
>>Salix, IA
>
>
>
>
>
> There is a lot more going on here than "normal" web lag. I can't claim to
> understand it but the common explanations given by various members about it
> being normal for list mail just don't cut it. I own a dozen list and I am on a
> whole herd more and none have these kinds of lag. My own list are all on Yahoo
> Groups and much of the time if I hit send on a message by the time the regular
> screen is back up on my email client I can hit the check mail button and my
> message is back to me already. When there is a delay it is rarely more than 10
> minutes. Most of the time we on those list can almost carry on an un-
> interrupted conversation back and forth even with overseas members. A lot of
> the genealogy list I am on are on Rootsweb.com and message time is pretty much
> always in a few minutes, not hours. The last several messages I have sent here
> are in hours and one came back the next day.
> I cannot begin to say if it is something in the nature of Spencers servers or
> how in some way his list mail is identified or if it might somehow be the first
> "station" (for lack of a better word) that mail coming to or leaving his server
> hits or what the situation is. Maybe they snag on Clingman's Dome (in the
> Smokies). Maybe it all has to pass through the CIA... ;-) I do know that
> he works hard to provide the best service he can so I tend to place blame on
> something between his servers and my dialup connection. Not being able to
> identify it I usually just call it #$%& %&$# #&%$ ! ! ! ;-)
> While it "is" an annoyance at times it is certainly something I can tolerate
> in order to be on the list. Few of my messages are time critical. Even with
> those warts I am just glad that the list is here and do try to thank Spencer
> from time to time for it... (Thanks Spencer). :-)
>
> Going out at 10:22 Indiana time.
More information about the AT
mailing list