[AT] Tractor Weight (now Ramble - LONG)
tomehrkam at houston.rr.com
tomehrkam at houston.rr.com
Wed Jan 12 10:56:34 PST 2005
http://www.gibbstractorcollection.com.au/modelwk40.htm
The weight is 7068 lb according to the link above.
----- Original Message -----
From: Greg Hass <gkhass at avci.net>
Date: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 11:51 am
Subject: [AT] Tractor Weight (now Ramble - LONG)
> The reason I asked for the weight of the tractor was to see what
> type of
> trailer it would take to haul one. Now for the rest of the story...
>
> My grandfather died when I was about 6 so I do not remember him,
> but I
> have heard a lot about him from family and relatives. He came
> over from
> Germany as a child and worked his early adult years for the
> railroad to get
> money to start farming. He was a very progressive farmer for the
> time. Besides farming, they did a lot of custom work. All summer
> my one
> uncle would take the best team of horses and work for the county
> pulling
> gravel scrapers. The first tractor they purchased was an F-12
> which they
> bought not to do heavy tillage, but to do cultivating and light
> work. My
> dad said he spent many, many hours each year doing custom
> cultivating for
> other farmers, besides cultivating their own crops, as most people
> only had
> horse-drawn cultivators. At some time after this, he purchased 3
> thrash
> machines: a grain machine, an edible bean machine, and a clover
> huller. These machines he ran with an F-20, which by this time he
> had
> purchased.
> However, due to the fact that they ran the machines all summer
> and into
> the winter, the tremendous hours (plus the fact that the machine
> was being
> loaded so heavily) wore the tractor out. In fact at one stop, my
> dad said
> the tractor had lost so much power that the neighbors made fun of
> it by
> pulling the heads off the wheat and throwing just the heads in to
> the
> thrashing machine. At this point, my grandfather purchased a WK-
> 40 (as
> mentioned by one or two replies to my previous post, the K denoted
> kerosene, while a W-40 was gas only). As shown in some of the
> books, the
> WK-40 has over twice the belt horsepower of an F-20. All of the
> neighbors
> laughter quickly turned to sweat. It appeared the tractor was
> unstoppable,
> as illustrated by what a neighbor (not long since deceased) had
> told me.
> At the time Michigan law required that someone had to be sitting
> on the
> tractor whenever the thrashing machine was running in case someone
> fell
> in. Many times that was my grandfather, who always smoked a pipe
> and was
> known as quite a "thinker". According to the story, the machine
> plugged. However, it didn't phase the tractor. Our neighbor said
> smoke
> was rolling off the belt. Someone had to runn back to the tractor
> and tell
> my grandfather the machine was plugged so he could shut it off.
> Another
> time, the next-door neighbor had a sod field he could not plow
> with the
> horses. When my uncle pulled in with the WK-40 and a three-bottom
> plow,
> the neighbor said it couldn't be done. However, when my uncle
> dropped the
> 3 plows into the ground and headed across the field, they said
> this
> neighbor literally dropped down on his knees in disbelief. (My
> uncle has
> said they didn't make much money on that job because they had to
> plow in
> low gear and fuel consumption was high.)
> Shortly after this, my uncle and my grandfather got into an
> argument. My
> grandfather, being the dad, won when they switched the tractor
> over to
> rubber tires. My uncle wanted steel because it was his job to set
> up the
> machine, usually in a barnyard. Usually he could back it in and
> have it
> set in 20 minutes with the steel and lug wheels. However, with
> rubber
> tires, he sometimes fought for 2 hours to get the machine placed
> where he
> wanted it in the slippery barnyard. (I will leave it to your
> imagination
> to decide why the barnyard was slippery!)
> As the older boys married and left home, my grandfather decided
> to get out
> of the custom business. However, he felt he could not do that as
> long as
> he owned that big tractor, so it was sold and a Farmall H was
> purchasedin
> its place. After that, when someone wanted custom work done, he
> told them
> he did not own a tractor big enough to adequately run the machines
> to do
> custom work.
> Although we have only seen pictures of this tractor, my brother
> has
> recently decided that he would, if possible, like to locate the
> original
> tractor. Unfortunately, those that knew anything about it are now
> deceased. My one uncle (in his mid-80s) says he did not have much
> to do
> with the tractor but thinks it was sold to someone with a
> sawmill. According to other people, there were only 3 of those
> tractors in
> this area. After making 30 or 40 phone calls, my brother has
> verified that
> they did exist. He also has called everybody he knows that has
> had or
> still has a sawmill. He has sort of come to a dead end on
> locating the
> original, although he did find one sawmill owner who has one who
> still uses
> it to run the mill. It was overhauled 8 years ago. This was the
> reason
> for the post on the weight. Should he find one, he was wondering
> if his
> trailer was capable of hauling it.
> The guy who still uses his WK-40 on his sawmill says he has been
> offered
> $17,000 for it, but he has 2 sons that want it.
> Hope this story is of some interest to list members.
>
> Greg Hass
>
> _______________________________________________
> AT mailing list
> http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at
>
More information about the AT
mailing list