[AJD] Delayed posts

[Dean VP]

Steve:

It is my belief that there are phrases, words or characters in the headers
of our ATIS email messages that are somehow causing the servers along the
line to take second notice probably diverting our messages for further
processing at a later time. All I'm asking is, if this is the reason for the
delayed messages could the header information be changed somehow so that our
messages would not be as suspicious to the other servers? 

Dean A. Van Peursem
Snohomish, WA 98290

I'm a walking storeroom of facts..... I've just lost the key to the
storeroom door 


www.deerelegacy.com

http://members.cox.net/classicweb/email.htm



-----Original Message-----
From: antique-johndeere-bounces at lists.antique-tractor.com
[mailto:antique-johndeere-bounces at lists.antique-tractor.com] On Behalf Of
Steve W.
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 10:39 AM
To: Antique John Deere mailing list
Subject: Re: [AJD] Delayed posts

 Just look at the header info and you will see that 99 percent of the
delays are not ATIS related. They are caused by sheer volume of
messages.

Return-Path: <antique-johndeere-bounces at lists.antique-tractor.com>
Received: from murder (cyr-fe4.logical.net [209.23.116.88])
  by cyr-backend2.logical.net (Cyrus v2.2.8-Invoca-RPM-2.2.8-2) with
LMTPA;
  Thu, 20 Jan 2005 02:18:56 -0500
X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2
Received: from cyr-fe4.logical.net ([unix socket])
  by cyr-fe4.logical.net (Cyrus v2.2.10-Invoca-RPM-2.2.10-2) with LMTPA;
  Thu, 20 Jan 2005 02:27:49 -0500
Received: from psmtp.com (exprod6mx114.postini.com [64.18.1.106])
 by cyr-fe4.logical.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id j0K7RmvF009091
 for <falcon at telenet.net>; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 02:27:48 -0500
Received: from source ([24.172.4.211]) by exprod6mx114.postini.com
([64.18.5.10]) with SMTP;
 Wed, 19 Jan 2005 23:18:54 PST
Received: from heavyiron.atis.net (heavyiron.atis.net [127.0.0.1])
 by heavyiron.atis.net (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j0K75upE031692;
 Thu, 20 Jan 2005 02:06:01 -0500
Received: from b0643.vr.mx.mail-abuse.com (b0643.vr.mx.mail-abuse.com
 [168.61.6.43])
 by heavyiron.atis.net (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j0JKq1Td018936
 for <antique-johndeere at lists.antique-tractor.com>;
 Wed, 19 Jan 2005 15:52:01 -0500
X-MAPS-MX: 0 2044.235112.6048.1106167888
Received: from smtp.fidnet.com ([216.229.64.73])
 by b0643.vr.mx.mail-abuse.com (8.13.0/8.13.0) with SMTP id
 j0JKpSbs072738 for <antique-johndeere at lists.antique-tractor.com>;
 Wed, 19 Jan 2005 12:51:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 10645 invoked from network); 19 Jan 2005 20:51:27 -0000
Received: from 64-251-131-86-dialup-mo.fidnet.com (HELO ?127.0.0.1?)
 (garyepps at 64.251.131.86)
 by smtp.fidnet.com with SMTP; 19 Jan 2005 20:51:27 -0000
Message-ID: <41EEC82F.4040001 at fidnet.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 14:50:55 -0600
From: Gary Epps <garyepps at fidnet.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Antique John Deere mailing list
 <antique-johndeere at lists.antique-tractor.com>
Subject: Re: [AJD] Delayed posts
References:
<007601c4fcf2$f1278240$0200a8c0 at enduseradc1hxs><41ED1AB1.1090402 at fidnet.
com> <41ED6460.20907 at fidnet.com>
 <08d801c4fdcb$92bffaa0$6501a8c0 at duane>
In-Reply-To: <08d801c4fdcb$92bffaa0$6501a8c0 at duane>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new
X-BeenThere: antique-johndeere at lists.antique-tractor.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Reply-To: Antique John Deere mailing list
 <antique-johndeere at lists.antique-tractor.com>



Steve Williams
Near Cooperstown, New York



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Gary Epps" <garyepps at fidnet.com>
To: "Antique John Deere mailing list"
<antique-johndeere at lists.antique-tractor.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 3:50 PM
Subject: Re: [AJD] Delayed posts


> I didn't mean to say that I haven't seen delays also, but the specific
> ones that Dee mentioned came into my mailbox pretty promptly.  Maybe
if
> we each enter the time sent in the body of each email we send, like
some
> of you have been doing, we can get a better handle on the time lag.
>
> Gary
> 2:50pm CST
>
> Duane Larson wrote:
> > Gary,
> > I have done numerous email checks, since that is the system ATIS
uses, and I
> > seem to have absolutely no problem with timely arrival of emails
locally and
> > around the country.  I suspect it has to do with ATIS server
security issues
> > or something, since responses seem to be slowing down as security
patches to
> > computers increase.  Who knows.
> > Sent 9:05 pm EST.
> > Duane Larson

_______________________________________________
Antique-johndeere mailing list
http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/antique-johndeere