Alt fuels was Re: [AT] Gasoline $
DAVIESW739 at aol.com
DAVIESW739 at aol.com
Thu Aug 11 10:02:49 PDT 2005
Ken, these were early 80s with stock engines i suppose about 7.5 to 1. they
were getting almost 30 on gas before the test we kept a couple without
changing them over and they did get around 28 to 30 mpg on the base.
Yes you are correct they should do better with higher compression but I was
looking at a website where they claimed that a Ford Ranger got 17 city on gas
and 14 city on E85 I know a lot of people who have Rangers and they get
around 26 on gas. I think a lot of these sites are promoting their products.
Anyway it was consistant with what George has said. I just don't trust
these sites after having first hand experience with E85.
Walt Davies
Cooper Hollow Farm
Monmouth, OR 97361
503 623-0460
More information about the AT
mailing list