[AT] OT - GM 8.2L Diesel

[charlie hill]

Hi James,

I think some of the folks that have replied to this thread are thinking 
about the 6.2L GM diesel.  As you know, the 8.2 is altogether different.

Charlie
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "James Yost" <jnyost at yahoo.com>
To: "Antique tractor email discussion group" <at at lists.antique-tractor.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 7:02 AM
Subject: Re: [AT] OT - GM 8.2L Diesel


> Phil,
>
> Are you talking about the 4 cycle Detroit? I believe
> you are. I have one of these in one of my grain trucks
> and it is an excellant engine. One thing you do need
> to do is have the rack gone through by a diesel engine
> shop unless you have all the equipment every so many
> 1000 miles. Can not remember right now how often. It
> basically is nothing but a tune up. I have not had any
> problems with heads or gaskets in mine.
>
> Good luck, Jim
>
>
>
> --- "Phil M. Vorwerk" <pvorwerk at newulmtel.net> wrote:
>>
>> Does anybody have information/experience with GM's
>> 8.2 Liter Diesel?  We are
>> considering buying a 1984 GMC 7000 Bucket truck with
>> the 8.2 and an
>> automatic.  I've done some looking on the internet
>> and it seems that there
>> is a wide diversity of opinion on this engine.  I
>> tend to trust the
>> experience of everyone here more so than other
>> sources, so I'm putting this
>> out to the list.
>>
>> Thanks -
>> Phil V
>> Courtland, MN
>>
>> -- 
>> No virus found in this outgoing message.
>> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
>> Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.1 - Release
>> Date: 4/1/2005
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> AT mailing list
>> http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at
>>
>
> Jim and Janna Yost
> Utica, Ohio
> USA
> jnyost at yahoo.com
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Personals - Better first dates. More second dates.
> http://personals.yahoo.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> AT mailing list
> http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at
>