[Steam-engine] Safety Valves - Part 2
Bruce & Marlene Babcock
babcock2 at gte.net
Sun Sep 19 18:58:34 PDT 2004
The significance of the difference between had-fired and automatically-fired boilers is that the pressure in automatically-fired boilers can be easily controlled so as not to get within 10% of the set point. Because of this, valve manufacturers have been able to manufacture more economical valves that do not need to seal tightly within this 10% range. We are using valves that are designed for a different application. We have no other choice. If we wish to use a new valve this is all that is available today .
The modern safety valve's role as a back-up device and its inability to withstand severe use was clearly supported by the Kunkle Valve Company in its Catalog 85 in 1985: "Avoid excessive 'popping' of the safety/relief valve as even one opening can provide a means for leakage. Safety/relief valves should be operated only often enough to assure that they are in good working order." Kunkle does not suggest a schedule for verifying the operation of their valves. In contrast, in 1909, Lunkenheimer suggested that their valves should be operated at least once a day.
At one time, Jayco was considering producing old-style valves for use on hand-fired boilers. I do not know if they are proceeding with their plans.
Until old-style valves are available, I suggest that we do whatever we can to make the new style valves more satisfactory. Specifying the setpoint at 4%, as I mentioned in my previous message, may be one approach. Some owners are experimenting with nonmetallic seats.
Bruce E. Babcock
More information about the AT
mailing list