[AT] Question OT

Dean VP deanvp at att.net
Thu May 13 16:48:11 PDT 2004


Landen:

Ooops, I now see what the problem is. I did a boo boo. I intended to say the
7.3L engine isn't available any more in the 2004 models. Not in synch today.

Dean A. Van Peursem
Snohomish, WA 98290

What people can dream, people can do! George W. Bush

www.deerelegacy.com

http://members.cox.net/classicweb/email.htm




-----Original Message-----
From: at-bounces at lists.antique-tractor.com
[mailto:at-bounces at lists.antique-tractor.com] On Behalf Of Landen Schooler
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 4:17 PM
To: Antique tractor email discussion group
Subject: Re: [AT] Question OT



Dean VP wrote:
> 
> To follow up on the 7.3 Diesel recommendation, I went a bit out of my way
to
> get the 7.3 vs. the 6.0 engine on my 2003 model F250. I have not regretted
> it as I have not had an ounce of trouble in 16,000 miles including a R/T
to
> Moline, IL pulling heavy loads both ways.


snip....


> that has a 7.3L engine. If I remember right the 6.0L wasn't available for
> the new 2004's.

Since when? I was looking at one at the dealer a couple of weeks ago.

Landen Schooler
Palmyra, Iowa

> 
> Dean A. Van Peursem
> Snohomish, WA 98290

_______________________________________________
AT mailing list
http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at



_______________________________________________
AT mailing list
http://www.antique-tractor.com/mailman/listinfo/at




More information about the AT mailing list